User talk:DPF429

July 2024

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Paisley Park (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man am sorry I just looked at the sources and look at the genres especially in the song’s page or in the album’s page I’ll make to find sourced genes now DPF429 (talk) 11:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am sorry for adding unsourced genres in prince songs I haven’t really known how to use sources so I come with websites and sources (including Wikipedia) to search for the genres especially for computer blue when the bottom of the page said the song was an experimental rock number I am so sorry yall DPF429 (talk) 11:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Private Joy, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dirty Mind (Prince song). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not only are you adding unreferenced genres, but you are continuing the same behavior by New York City IP Special:Contributions/2604:2D80:9103:4D00:74A4:5677:69AB:D5B8. That's a violation of WP:MULTIPLE which can get you blocked. Binksternet (talk) 19:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Purple rain

One of the most amazing albums of all which is a mix of rock pop funk R&B and psychedelia DPF429 (talk) 20:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When doves cry is experimental pop neo psychedelia soul avant- pop synth pop funk and pop rock let’s go crazy is hard rock and funk rock purple rain is rock R&B gospel and orchestral I would die 4 u is synth funk synth pop and dance take me with u is psychedelic rock psychedelic pop and psychedelic soul the beautiful ones is soul and new age computer blue is synth funk and experimental rock darling Nikki is hard rock and baby I’m a star is hard psychedelic rock funk rock and synth funk DPF429 (talk) 20:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Sorry for blocking you as a sock puppet by mistake.

PhilKnight (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New-age Prince song

A while ago, you added New-age to the infobox to a song by Prince. Do you remember its name? 50.168.195.246 (talk) 16:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only Prince song that’s noted as new age is beautiful ones DPF429 (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]