User talk:Daffyduck1234

Welcome!

Hello, Daffyduck1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hello! Daffyduck1234, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Margie Hines

Please do not continue to insert a date of death for this actress without a citation from a reliable source to back it up. You need to read the previous discussion on the article's talk page. BMK (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP! and read

Please stop editing now, you are creating articles which do not follow Wikipedia policy. Please see the help information above and learn something about Wikipedia before you continue to edit. BMK (talk) 22:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jordan fry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jordan fry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BMK (talk) 22:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Pennell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William Pennell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BMK (talk) 22:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Pennell

The article William Pennell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, claim given for notability not sourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BMK (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Weinberg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mike Weinberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not upload copyrighted images from IMDB

Please do not upload photos from IMDB to Commons, when you do not have the permission of the copyright owner to do so. BMK (talk) 00:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Friend, you need to stop, because you're doing many things very wrong.

Commons does not accept copyrighted photographs unless you present evidence that you have the permission of the copyright owner to upload it. You cannot slap "Own work" on a photo lifted from IMDB and upload it to Commons. Here on Wikipedia, WP:NFCC controls when non-free material can be used. IN a nutshell, copyrighted photos of people who are alive are almost never used, and copyrighted which are uploaded (here or on Commons) without proper permission are never used.
Controversial edits are discussed and a consensus of editors decides what to do. You cannot blithely edit against consensus and continue to revert when your edits are removed.
The subjects of articles have to be notable, and you must present proof, in the form of citations from reliable sources, of thatnotability.
If the subject of an article is alive, it is mandatory that there be at least one citation in the article, and the very special Biography of living persons rules apply.

There's a lot more to editing here than just typing. Please utilize the links above to familiarize yourself with some of the rules. The alternative is that you're likely to be blocked from editing. BMK (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert, please stop...

...you just can't continue to edit anyway you want when you're being told that what you're doing is incorrect or violates policies. Since you've neither answered me or stopped your editing, I've felt it necessary to ask an admin to come and talk to you. You can see my request here. BMK (talk) 01:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you left a warning for me on my user page here. First, you should know that comments and messages should go on a user's talk page, not their user page. Second, what, exactly, are you warning me about? BMK (talk) 01:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've left another message [1], again on my user page, asking "What can I edit?". I suggest you use the "Teahouse" link above and talk to the folks there, I'm sure they'll have good advice for you about how to get into editing Wikipedia without causing disruption. BMK (talk) 01:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Bobby! BMK is giving you some great advice, the Tea House is a really good place to get started at Wikipedia. If you don't mind a bit more reading, you can also look over Wikipedia:Plain and simple. Or for a faster introduction to Wikipedia, check out Wikipedia:Introduction. -- Atama頭 01:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pat Cassotta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pat Cassotta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Scarlettail (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buddy red bow

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buddy red bow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BMK (talk) 02:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to William Pennell. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Betty McGlown. Elassint ^Hi 16:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Margie Hines. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 19:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Robert!

If you look at your talk page, you'll see that other editors are also worried about the editing you are doing on Wikipedia, and one of them has said that if you don't change the way you're editing, you may be blocked so that you cannot edit here any more. Wikipedia is a very big project, with a lot of active editors, and sometimes we don't agree with each other, so we need to discuss our disagreements. If you don't do that, that is another reason you might be blocked -- so please answer here to what other people have said. (Your talk page is one place you can edit without making any problems for anyone!)

Have you talked to the folks at the Teahouse yet? If not, why not go there and get some advice about how you can best serve Wikipedia and help to make it grow. Just click on this link. BMK (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to be helpful

Stop talking to me I created Wikipedia and I forbid blocking my edits. Daffyduck1234 (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. User:Atama (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]