User talk:DailyJew

Vesela Kyuleva moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vesela Kyuleva, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Isabel Yeamans

added a link pointing to Francis Rogers

Joseph Knox Walker

added a link pointing to Robert Tyler

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irving Family of New Brunswick

Hi thanks for creating this article, but you need better sources. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source on Wikipedia and you will need something better than Forbes to show that the family is notable. All the best Mccapra (talk) 02:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me This Family is Notable, They are very well known and Practically Run my province of NB. Thanks for the feedback. I mostly created this article as a way for people to easily find thr members of the Family. Feel free to add what You think is necessary! Thnx ~ Nat DailyJew (talk) 02:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irving Family of New Brunswick moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Irving Family of New Brunswick, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

🖕 DailyJew (talk) 03:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Execuflight Flight 1526

A tag has been placed on Draft:Execuflight Flight 1526 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A larger, more accurate draft already exists at Draft:ExecuFlight Flight 1526.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ZLEA _T\^C 02:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catarina Martins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assembly of the Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Oromo Liberation Front, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD up

Not sure if reply tool notified you, so dropping a note here Slywriter (talk) 02:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! DailyJew (talk) 03:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vesela Kyuleva (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review WP:YFA, WP:MOS and WP:BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vesela Kyuleva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 02:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DailyJew! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 02:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Focus on content

Hello. You participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labor Caucus (United States), where you commented on the motivations of the nominator. To keep discussions WP:civil on Wikipedia, please make sure you WP:assume good faith and WP:focus on content instead. Thanks! Femke (talk) 16:37, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi DailyJew! I noticed that you often mark edits as minor that aren't minor. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathleen Murphy (Illinois politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen Murphy (Illinois politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Murphy (Illinois politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trudy Busch Valentine (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Trudy Busch Valentine instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject of this draft BLP is a candidate for political office. As a candidate, they do not satisfy political notability, and so must be evaluated based on general notability. This draft does not speak for itself as to the candidate's general notability, and so will be declined. This draft should only be resubmitted if the body of the draft is expanded to show general notability. (Do not simply add references and resubmit.) You may ask for advice about articles on political candidates at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trudy Busch Valentine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trudy Busch Valentine (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trudy Busch Valentine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vesela Kyuleva (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vesela Kyuleva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephanie Trussell

The article Stephanie Trussell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject is not notable enough

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irving Family of New Brunswick (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need sources that have written in-depth about the family, not just individual members.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irving Family of New Brunswick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DailyJew. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 13:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ExecuFlight Flight 1526 (September 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Slywriter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No appreciable improvement. AfD is clear that this is not notable

Slywriter (talk) 15:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irving Family of New Brunswick (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irving Family of New Brunswick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 18:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DailyJew please see the suggestions on the talk page on how to make this article notable. CT55555(talk) 20:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephanie Trussell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Trussell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Trussell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elli (talk | contribs) 21:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vesela Kyuleva

Hello, DailyJew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vesela Kyuleva, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vesela Kyuleva

Hello, DailyJew. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vesela Kyuleva".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]