User talk:Daniela Gh
Welcome!
|
Nomination of Avant-garde architecture for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avant-garde architecture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avant-garde architecture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 22:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Patrik Schumacher has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 22:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Patrik Schumacher
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Patrik Schumacher, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.egs.edu/faculty/patrik-schumacher/biography/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wgolf (talk) 22:53, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Status and Advice
[edit]- As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article as a copy of his web site. We can not use it here without a full free license under the formalities of WP:DCM, which irrevocably permits anyone in the world for using , modify, and distributing it for any purpose, even commercial. But that is not advised, for material on a website is usually written in a promotional manner, and is generally not suitable for an encyclopedia. That was the case here: the material on his books was promational rather than informative. He is notable, so it is probably worth trying over.
- If you have a WP:Conflict of interest, the only really acceptable way to do this is to use WP:Articles for Creation. You also need to declare your conflict of interest on your user page, see our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Parametricism, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Status and Advice
[edit]The parametricism article doesn't need just tinkering--it needs rewriting in a NPOV style, as if you were someone not in any manner connected with the theory. Try to write it telling a reader not particular co involved in architecture what it is about, with references to standard secondary works if possible, not just the primary articles proposing the theory by its supporters. It reads too much like advocacy, and we don't do that here. I'm holding off on sending it to afd for a few days to give you a chance at it, but anyone else might do so at any time. DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello DGG. Several Wikipedia editors have commented on this entry. I revised it NUMEROUS times to satisfy the criteria of objectivity and the article is now reflective of the subject AS IT IS ACCEPTED BY THE ARCHITECURAL COMMUNITY. This is not an opinion piece, it is a description of a new style of architecture that is very much in the process of establishing a global presence. The citations are entirely informative and appropriate for this article. The other Wikipedia editors have removed their tags after this article was revised, apparently satisfied that the criteria has been met. After reading Wikipedia's policies, I must say that there has been thus far no attempt by any of the editors to follow through with the policy of non-intimidation of new contributors. I have responded responsibly to all criticism and have worked on this article extensively since it was posted, but it seems that new editors will continue to tag the article without reviewing the revision history, which explicitly documents how similar criticisms were addressed to the satisfaction of other editors. The portion of the article that you refer to as an outline is in fact an enumeration of core principles. There are MANY precedents for this type of entry, including charts, lists, etc. In the context of the article, this is not an outline, but rather a LIST OF PRINICPLES. I am not sure why it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria, seeing as how there are lists included in other articles! I appreciate the editorial vigilance of Wikipedia, but it seems like a never-ending process of critique by uncoordinated editor comments, revisiting the same issues over and over again - even after they were remedied - with absolutely no continuity or real attempt to communicate in manner that is constructive to the contribution. - Daniela Gh (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Parametricism for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parametricism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parametricism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
REPLY TO DGG FROM THE MAIN WRITER/CONTRIBUTOR OF THIS ARTICLE: Please review the Talk tab of the Parametricism page. Note that the article was flagged as follows: "This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks." It is imperative to involve this group in the discussion, since it is a group comprised of experts in the field of architecture, who can substantiate that (1) Parametricism should be included in Wikipedia and (2) other than your request for a revision of what you call the "outline" (which in fact is a list of heuristic principles, and no different than other lists included in other Wikipedia arcitlces), this is in fact a factual article about a highly visible and widespread style of contemporary architecture. As a new contributor, I would like to add that this article was reviewed by several Wikipedia editors who requested changes that were made, to their satisfaction. Daniela Gh (talk) 02:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
The article Patrik Schumacher has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
October 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Patrik Schumacher— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |