User talk:Dannyniu
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Dannyniu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 16:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
In [1] you write that "Also, there's the trivia that quantum computers can pre-image a sponge function in capacity/3 compared to outlen/2 on true random oracles." Did you confuse pre-image resistance and collision resistance here? If not, please provide a reference and change the section SHA-3#Capacity change controversy. Also, I don't understand the reference to sponge functions; the result about collision resistance is not specific to them but applies to any hash function. --rtc (talk) 21:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- @rtc, I came across the claim to that trivia at here. He didn't provide reference to the claims in the answer, but I suppose a lookup on analysis of sponge functions in academic sections of major search engines would return some results. Dannyniu (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, I got it. Confused capacity and outlen. Keccak capacity is 2*outlen. Therefore, capacity/3 = 2/3*outlen. That is larger than outlen/2! --rtc (talk) 13:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Survey Invite
[edit]I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 17:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Done. Dannyniu (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Howdy, I found that you didn't correctly format your AfD nomination for Edon80. I havt fixed it. To correctly set up an AfD, use the following text:
{{subst:afd2|pg=[Article title]|cat=[Categorization letter (e.g. U for unsorted)]|text=[Your reason for nominating the article for deletion]}}
Tanks! LaundryPizza03 (talk) 03:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: J2k (April 8)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:J2k and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:J2k, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Dannyniu!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 05:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
NewHope
[edit]FYI: I've tried to clean up the issues noted in the NewHope AfC and moved it back to article space. See Talk:NewHope.--agr (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |