User talk:Darkch2

Welcome!

Hello, Darkch2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Syɛd Шαмiq Aнмɛd Hαsнмi (тαlк) 17:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huxley (unit).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 09:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Darkch2, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hello, Darkch2. You have new messages at Rankersbo's talk page.
Message added 18:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huxley (unit) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huxley (unit), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huxley (unit)

Hello Darkch2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Huxley (unit)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huxley (unit)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkch2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Hmm... I do not understand why I was blocked. I am not using any webhost or anything similar... Darkch2 (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To process this request we'll need to know the IP address of the supposed web host that was blocked; it is contained in the block message. If you don't want to publish the IP address please proceed via WP:UTRS. I apologize for the inconvenience. Huon (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Darkch2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Huon, sorry for not having submitted the IP. I didn't know about that. The one which is displayed at the blocking screen is 83.221.128.0/19 Does that help?

Accept reason:

Since you have made edits in article space since this unblock request, you must have changed IPs and no longer be caught by a block, so I am procedurally closing this. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

.

Copyright problem on Speed of light

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?DOI=10.4236/jhepgc.2017.34048. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Speed of light. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]