User talk:Darrenackers

Open All Hours

Hi, Darrenackers. I created most of the articles of "Open All Hours". I think it is a brilliant tv series (was voted eighth as Britain's Best Sitcom in a BBC poll). I am glad that you created "The New Suit" episode, I think it was great. I do not understad TTN's manic anti-tv episode behaviour. I do not understand that YOU have to justify that the episode has to be in wikipedia, I think that HE has to justify that it has not to be there. Anyway, there is no consensus at all, in fact I see an overwhelming feeling that TV episodes should be included in wikipedia. Many people are working on writing them. Keep on the good work FernandoGonz 25 june 2007

Episodes

Please see WP:EPISODE. Reverting will get you nowhere; you need to work on them. TTN 21:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Since nobody else has, Welcome!

Hello, Darrenackers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! . --Concrete Cowboy 12:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Logicity

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Logicity, by RHaworth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Logicity is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Logicity, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Logicity

A tag has been placed on Logicity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Logicity

An editor has nominated Logicity, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logicity and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]