User talk:Darth007

WP:ANI

Your edits are the subject of discussion at the Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents at this thread. You may wish to comment there. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. –xeno^talk 13:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HTC Desire.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:HTC Desire.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. tb240904 ^{Talk Contribs} 21:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:HTC_DesirePromo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:HTC_DesirePromo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HTC Desire

Hi there, could you please explain this edit to me? I'm unsure why you removed this image, especially since you removed a free image to replace it with a non-free version. Regards SWM (SoWhy[on]Mobile) 06:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Please do not undo my edits without explaining yours first. The image in question is copyrighted by HTC and per our non-free content criteria, we should never use any image as fair use if another, free image serves the same purpose. Please do not edit war over this. Regards So Why 09:24, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know you may have taken a while to create this image with your photoshop. I commend your work. However, this image has not been authorised by HTC. No edit war intended --Darth007 (talk) 13:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have not created the image nor is it PhotoShopped. It seems to be a photo made by one of our members. I mainly came here as an admin concerned over a potential copyright violation. But you seem to misunderstand our non-free content criteria: Wikipedia does not check whether HTC has authorized the image. In fact, the reason we used it is because the image you re-added is copyrighted to HTC while the replacement is not. Please read WP:NFCC#1 and explain how your edit is compatible with that policy. If you cannot or won't do so, I will nominate the copyrighted image for deletion. On a side note, if you do not intend to edit war, please stop restoring the image after people disagreed with that edit and instead use the talk page to discuss the issue. Regards SWM (SoWhy[on]Mobile) 15:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has permission to use the original "free" HTC image for non-commercial use. Also is the replacement image fully illustrative of the product? We do not have a back view of the product. If the original free image was fine then why replace with a homemade and less illustrative one? I hope you are as thorough in scrutiny with the individual who uploaded the replacement image. --Darth007 (talk) 19:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per our policies, "for non-commercial use only" is equal to "non-free" and as such those images are only allowed within the strict non-free content criteria only. See WP:NFC for further details. I grant you that the missing back of the phone is a valid concern but it does not make the original image "free" as far as our policies are concerned. We should discuss this in more detail though, since I don't think that the back of the phone is important enough to make the replacement image less useful. Regards So Why 20:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are two issues here. Is the original image valid under WP:NFC policy?; Is the repalcement image less illustrative?; Rather than enter into a discussion about interpretaion of policy or semantics, you simply need to consider if original image has been repeated by the replacement image. --Darth007 (talk) 20:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the original image is valid, as it is free content. IF and only IF there is no suitable free content alternative available do we use the non-free version. The free version is fine, it shows what the phone looks like. On another, albeit similar note, for the image, do not revert to a higher quality non-free image, it it per our policies to use as small of possible of non-free images. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 20:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm content with the smaller image. I requested the size to be 115 KB not 15 KB as the reduced image as it appeared a little pixelated and blurred (115 KB size appears to be the norm on most articles). Please consider "contextual signicance" under WP:NFC. I've stated the reasons quite clearly above. I do not wish to enter into a debate or edit war. --Darth007 (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please double indent your comments so that they are a reply to mine, first off. Second, you did not reduce it to 115KB, but rather to 1.29 MB. Could be a waste of bandwidth for both Wikimedia servers, and for dial-up users. The 1.29 MB size equates to a 2,000 X ~2,000 pixel image, which wouldn't even fit on my 17 inch monitor, let alone in an infobox. I reduced the image size to be about the size rendered in the only article it is used in. No offense, but your reason "Is the original image valid under WP:NFC policy?" appears to be a misunderstanding of policy. If HTC sold you a phone, you are definitely allowed to take a picture of your nice new $200-ish phone. Policy number 1 of WP:NFC is " Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." The prior picture, or one easily created, would "serve the same encyclopedic purpose". This means a non-free image is unneeded. On another similar but different point, as SoWhy said, is the back of the phone that necessary? Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 23:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the back of the phone is necessary. As I explained, The article refers to aspects of the phone e.g. body shell, camera, flash, micro USB, Sense UI etc. The replacement image does not illustrate these aspects therefore rendering it less informative and unable to repeat the original image. Please note I reverted the image to reduced version.--Darth007 (talk) 09:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like the edit war notice below, consensus & policy is in favor of the free image. If you want a picture with the back of the phone visible, be bold and fix it! Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 02:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not against the free image. I want a free image, but not at the cost of less information in that image.

My reasons are very clear and I repeat. The article refers to aspects of the phone e.g. body shell, camera, flash, micro USB, Sense UI etc. The replacement image does not illustrate these aspects therefore rendering it less informative and unable to repeat the original image.

Perhaps if everyone was not a little over zealous in favour of the free image, took a step back, and actually addressed these details.

The arguments have not been good so far for the free image. Dismissing my argument for the original (albeit a reduced version) by saying "it's just the back of the phone" is a rather patronising tone and lacks any objectivity.

What is the Wikipedia ethos? Free image does not override contextual significance and helping to understand the subject and serve the encyclopedic purpose. Are you all missing the point here? "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."

If the replacement free image was similar to the (reduced) original then I would not object. It may be just "the back of the phone" but I'm trying to uphold a Wikipedia priniciple. --Darth007 (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, I seriously advise you to drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 14:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your editing until consensus is reached. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 18:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like consensus appears to be moving in favour of more info in accordance with WP:NFCC policy. Whoever uploaded the new images is doing a good job. Wasn't me in a different guise btw.--Darth007 (talk) 01:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on HTC Desire. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Courcelles (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let me make this very clear. You are edit warring against both consensus and policy. Please stop, or you will be blocked. Courcelles (talk) 11:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you trying to bury the argument. Administrators "ganging up" on one editor may constitute as "administrator abuse" not consensus. This is Wikipedia, please remember your values.

I am seeking a resolution by focussing on policy policy. I have not had an adequate response. In particular, Point 8 - Contextual significance. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."

Please respond regarding point 8 of WP:NFCC policy i.e. "Contextual significance". --Darth007 (talk) 13:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:HTC_DesirePromo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HTC_DesirePromo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 18:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I have asked you before but it seems I have to do so again: Please do not restore your edits when people challenge them - discuss them on the talk page instead. You keep on restoring your preferred image to HTC Desire despite a number of people disagreeing with you. Per the bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle, your edit (B) was reverted (R) and you should proceed with discussing it (D) and not simply re-reverting it (R). This will not be helpful at all. I have started a discussion on the talk page since you seem unwilling to do so. Please participate at Talk:HTC Desire. Regards So Why 06:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:HTC Wildfire.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HTC Wildfire.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:HTC Desire 01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HTC Desire 01.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 22:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:HTC Desire Front & Rear.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HTC Desire Front & Rear.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:12, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Darth007.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Darth007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sangster's.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sangster's.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"HTC Desire (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect HTC Desire (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#HTC Desire (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]