User talk:Davedawit

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. This kind of "wit" belongs on Uncyclopedia, but not here, please. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 15:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you think your theories can be verified, add it into the article, properly sourced. Meantime, I'm not so green as I'm painted and I've been around long enough to know a hoax when I see one. Take it elsewhere, please, and stop wasting my time. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 16:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muller

Your comment is on the wrong editor's talk page. Muller was not paid to mistranslate anything, and there is no evidence whatever that he did so. This is a total myth that circulates among extremist Hindus, that's all. Paul B (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can say anything on blogs. They are as reliable on history as what a random bloke in bar says - it's just the internet equivalent. I suspect know more about Max Muller than you ever will. Have you even read any of his books? The claim that he "translated the Rig Veda in a demeaning style" is typical. This is repeated over and over and yet Max Muller did not translate the Rig Veda at all! Examples of this demeaning translation are never provided, because they don't exist. Paul B (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

El as Female Deity

This section your added to the 'El' talk page is drastically wrong to the point of me wondering your motive of putting it there. What is your evidence for your augment? Why did you put it up on the page? --Grammarbishop8 (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]