User talk:David1287

File copyright problem with File:Pomvol4.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Pomvol4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monster

Hello. You have several times changed the peak of the Skillet single Monster. The single has charted at both #4 on the Active Rock charts and #5 on Mainstream rock charts as show by these following links. ( http://www.americasmusiccharts.com/index.cgi?fmt=R2 ) ( http://www.newstimes.com/default/article/Best-Sellers-Audio-298568.php ) this has lead to great confusion as many people assume the two charts are the same. However the charts that are editing are show the peak of Mainstream Rock Singles not Active Rock Singles. I realise that you may not know this but unless you can provide evidence that the single has peaked at #4 on the Mainstream Rock charts then what you are doing can be considered as sabotage. if you ahve any questions about this feel free to ask them either in the discussion area on the page or on My talk Page. (116Rebel (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)).[reply]

February 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Destination X (2010), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TJ Spyke 17:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page 1901 (song) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The White Stripes discography. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to This Is War, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 21:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Add a source next time like you just did on the second edit. There was currently one available already, which was why I reverted your first edit.--F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 22:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Give Me a Sign, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Airplaneman ^talk 23:34, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, David1287. You have new messages at Talk:Between the Lines (Stone Temple Pilots song).
Message added 20:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 20:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, I responded on my talk page but if you click on the above link to the talk page (in the Talkback box), you'll be taken to the explanation of why I removed it. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:44, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hero

Hey could you please provide a refferance to your post that The Skillet song Hero has charted at #38 on the Mainstream rock charts? Thanks. (116Rebel (talk) 06:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Between the Lines (Stone Temple Pilots song). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Spigot Map 19:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for edit warring

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Between the Lines (Stone Temple Pilots song). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

— ξ ^xplicit 19:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And here I am again, warning you to cease from edit warring on Between the Lines (Stone Temple Pilots song). It's already been established on the talk page of the article that the chart does not belong. You can not go around restoring your edits against consensus simply due to your preference. Logging out and editing the article only worsens the situation and is surely making its way into sockpuppetry. Let me stress again: discuss the issue and gain consensus before making any controversial edits. If you have issues on how the guideline is set up, please initiate a discussion on the talk page of said guideline. Again, this is your only warning. Should you revert again and continue edit warring, whether in this account or logged out, you will be blocked from editing for a lengthier amount of time. — ξ ^xplicit 18:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, David1287. You have new messages at Keraunoscopia's talk page.
Message added 00:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, David1287. You have new messages at Jubileeclipman's talk page.
Message added 02:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jubilee ♫clipman 02:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Record Charts

Hello there. I noticed you had questions about Alternative Songs. If you look at the talk page for WP:record charts i've left you a response. I was heavily involved in designing and writing WP:USCHARTS so i have provided a reason for why Alternative Songs is not allowed (by my understanding of the information provided by Billboard) unless the song has not charted on rock songs. Please leave responses at the record charts talk page. happy editing. Lil-unique1 (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

another response for you.Lil-unique1 (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a more detailed explaination and rational for you which answers your latest question. =) Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cryin' Like A Bitch

Hey David, just to let you know, Cryin' Like A Bitch did reach number #1 on the Mainstream Rock Tracks/Active Rock Tracks.

http://www.radiowavemonitor.com/rock.asp http://cclamp.radioandrecords.com/rrwebsite20/Members/Charts.aspx?ChartId=2

I will undo all your changes right now.( EternalLies (talk) 23:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC) )[reply]

Diamond Eyes

Your completely unacceptable and consistent edit warring at Diamond Eyes (song) will stop immediately. When an editor links you to various guidelines and policies, as I have done on multiple occasions with you, it's in your best interest to read them. Had you visited WP:RS, as have I linked you to twice in my edit summaries, once on your IP talk page, and I'm almost positive I have had this exact same edit war with you on a separate article, you would have read that "self-published media—whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable." You are still more than welcome to contribute this information, you just need to cite a credible source. Since Billboard.com stopped posting Mainstream Rock charts, other acceptable sources include the Billboard magazine itself or possibly Billboard.biz. Fezmar9 (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David1287. Thank you. Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Diamond Eyes (song)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Diamond Eyes (song). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please reach a consensus on the Diamond Eyes talk page before making any more changes to the Charts section. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 07:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Diamond Eyes (song). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David1287, you are engaging in an edit war yet again. It also looks like you may be using a forum as a source of information, which according to WP:RS is largely unacceptable. You should use a search engine to find a proper secondary source. You need to discuss this edit on the article's talk page or on Fezmar9 (talk · contribs)'s talk page, since obviously there is a disagreement. You may choose to bring in a third opinion as well. Because this is the second warning for edit warring on the Diamond Eyes (song) article, I will report any future reverts that appear to be part of an edit war to the 3RR/edit war noticeboard. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Diamond Eyes (song). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fezmar9 (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Diamond Eyes (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fezmar9 (talk) 17:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David1287, the next step for me is to file a complaint at the administrator's notice board. I really don't want to do that, but you have ignored every single warning you have ever been given, and continue edit however you see fit. You introduce new charting information which contradicts the sources already provided. When asked to provide a source, you post the information to a forum and link it just so it can be "visible." But visibility is not the issue. You also ignore attempts at communication on talk pages to reach a consensus before making changes. If you would just wait ONE DAY for billboard.com to update, most of your edits could be verifiable. Also, if you could just take the time to read WP:RS to find out what defines a quality and reliable source when adding charts not currently published at billboard.com, then the rest of your edits would become verifiable. Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's core policies, and must be understood for you to continue editing.

One more edit in this manner to any article, not just Diamond Eyes (song), and I will file that complaint. This will lead to being temporarily blocked from editing. Continuing to edit in the same manner after that will lead to blocks of longer duration. Fezmar9 (talk) 17:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skillet discography

Thanks for your additions. There have been a number of undocumented changes to the Skillet discography page. Any additions need to have citations, particularly if you're removing a fact that has a citation. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:David1287 and Billboard charts. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 13:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for constant addition of chart material from forums, despite multiple editors requesting you not to do so. Block can be lifted by any admin when user agrees to provide references for all changes to charts, and to restrict himself to charts and sources listed on WP:USCHARTS and WP:GOODCHARTS. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 15:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David1287. Thank you. SGGH ^ping! 08:57, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Your Betrayal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Your Betrayal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seasonsafter 48124.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seasonsafter 48124.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]