User talk:Davidwbaker
A belated welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/300px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Davidwbaker. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Editor's index to Wikipedia
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Tom Petty 2017
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Tom_Petty_and_the_Heartbreakers%2C_2017-08-22.jpg/220px-Tom_Petty_and_the_Heartbreakers%2C_2017-08-22.jpg)
Hi David, let me start off by wishing you a happy newyear. I wish you all the best for 2024. I'm a little amazed at how I am the first to reach out to you since your first registered edit in 2015, not counting the above two templates. I have a question regarding the photo that you uploaded to Commons of a live show of Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers on August 22, 2017. I am currently working on an article about Petty's debut solo album on the Dutch Wikipedia. I want to dedicate a paragraph to live performances of songs from the album. Turns out they played a couple during the August 22, 2017 show. For that reason I was planning on including the photo. Using the default [[Image:...|thumb|...]], the picture is a little unclear. I could increase the size. But would you by any chance have other photo's of that show, that you haven't uploaded to Commons? If yes, would you be willing to? Best, Hiro (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! You can see the other photos from the August 22nd and August 28th, 2017 shows at:
- https://photos.app.goo.gl/B1HGLaFSc8j5nlfU2
- Let me know if you'd like me to upload any of them to Commons. Davidwbaker (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Those are nice photos! Thank you for being willing to share them. I thought about it for a few days, played with different setups. I think I'll stick with the photo shown here. I made it a bit bigger in the article than the default image width and centered it on the page. Looks quite nice, if I may say so myself.
Hiro (talk) 21:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Those are nice photos! Thank you for being willing to share them. I thought about it for a few days, played with different setups. I think I'll stick with the photo shown here. I made it a bit bigger in the article than the default image width and centered it on the page. Looks quite nice, if I may say so myself.