User talk:Dawud

Hi Dawud, I was reading the Buddhist Studies article and followed the link of Rosenberg, which led to Alfred Rosenberg, a nazi ideologists. I am not an expert, but from an article I read in internet by John Barlow, the Rosenberg you are referring to is Otto Rosenberg. John Barlow, “The mysterious case of the brilliant young Russian orientalist” - part 2 - International Association of Orientalist Librarians, Vol.43, 1998 http://wason.library.cornell.edu/iaol/Vol.43/barlow2.htm. Regards Roli51 (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dawud. I want to thank you for your work on the A.R.E. article. I am a longtime member of A.R.E. and it is good to see that someone has done such a good job of representing the A.R.E. on Wikipedia. I would like to hear back from you and find out your other interests, since I note the breadth of your interests from the various articles you have written and editted.

Please reply back to me via email at fdewey@mindspring.com .

Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you.

Fred Dewey Rochester, Ny (not my account)

Welcome!

Hello, Dawud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

This is Paul. I've noticed you editing the Baha'i Faith page - and also noticed that although you've now got an account, no-one has said hello to you yet. So, let me be the first to say Hi. I guess you're not entirely a new user, since from comments you made on the Baha'i article talk page you've made quite a few anon edits to various pages concerning mysticism - but I think it's useful to have one of the welcome templates where you can easily find it - it's got a few helpful links there.

Have fun at Wikipedia! PaulHammond 11:47, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Symbols

Heh Paul beat me to first comment - oh well. First off, whats this about five-pointed stars? And also are you sure that the caligraphy is Persian? I'll write a tidbit about Baha'i caligraphy in a mo, but I suspect its Arabic. -- Tomhab 01:25, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Criticisms

OK re-read the article and agree that much of it can't go on the main page. How about making a Bahá'í social principles page or something. Much of what has been written can be copied almost verbatim to there. Other aspects can go elsewhere. It also means we can shred a fair bit off the main page (which is getting reasonably long).

I hope you understand the reasoning for all this. You obviously know your stuff about the Baha'i faith, but an article with criticisms in the title really isn't appropriate and a little NPOV.

Let me know what you think on my talk page and we can get cracking. -- Tomhab 01:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well... I'm not entirely sure, but I think voting's pretty much done? maybe give it a few more days. -- Tomhab 10:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi, check out the Baha'i apologetics page. Since you started the original criticism page I want to see what you think. And since you seem interested in the subject I think you can do some valuable editing. But please provide references wherever possible! The criticism page barely had any and I ended up just cropping most of it. Cunado19 29 June 2005 14:00 (UTC)

New page

Got any to add? You know you have no life when

Regards Cunado19 16:04, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cayce

I'm glad to meet another Cayce fan, keep up the good work!--Jondel 00:18, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

Look, no offense, but that thing you just wrote in Jesus is full of weasel words and was definitely not neutral. Also, it's best not to make the article an essay pushing you POV. As you may or may not be aware, you have stated a position taken by some people. This is most definitely disputed, yet I don't really see the alternate POV being put forward. There is also an article that deals with this, Historicity of Jesus. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:21, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please use edit summaries when making edits so that it is easier for others interested in the articles you are editing to follow what you're doing. This is especially important at articles such as Taoism where you are making large numbers of edits one after another. Another thing that could help keep down the numbers of unsummarised edits would be to use the "Show preview" button to check your work before saving the new page. Thanks, --Fire Star 16:11, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Taoism

You deleted a whole section of the Taoism article with no comment as to why you thought it was invalid, what for? if you are going to delete whole sections of content because you don't think its relevant you should at least take ten seconds to explain why with a description.

WP:COI/N

Two reports, with the headings "CIIS" and "Baha'i (100+ boards)," were posted on WP:COI/N at 02:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC) by 218.167.163.63 (talk · contribs) but signed with your username. This note is just to check that it was actually you. — Athænara ✉ 02:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At 02:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC) you wrote: "Yes, it's me. Dawud"

OK, thanks for letting me know. — Æ. ✉ 05:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Godic religion

An editor has nominated Godic religion, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godic religion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

COIN

I moved your report to the project page WP:COIN rather than the talkpage, so that it will be more visible to other editors. I hope you get some help! --Slp1 (talk) 01:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No trolling please

I noticed the trollish section that you added to Dating, which was reverted (by someone other than me). Satanic messages? Goodness me. While online dating is arguably a risky business, there is no need to blast the point home with a thermonuclear sledgehammer.—greenrd (talk) 15:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Abhisamayalankara, Chapter Two

A tag has been placed on Abhisamayalankara, Chapter Two requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wisdom89 (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the Move tab, instead of cut&paste to move or 'rename' articles

Hello, Dawud. It appears that you copied and pasted Ron Rubin to Ron Rubin (voice actor). Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself using the move link at the top of the page, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you, Shawis (talk) 09:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Abhisamayalankara, Chapter One

I have nominated Abhisamayalankara, Chapter One, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhisamayalankara, Chapter One. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 14:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked about it, here's how AfD works. That nomination page will stay open for the next several days or so, and other editors on Wikipedia will voice their opinions on what should be done with the nominated articles. After time is up, administrators will come through and close the debates and set forth whatever the consensus of the discussion on the nomination page says. Read WP:AFD for more. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bohammed

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bohammed, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bohammed. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 09:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bohammed

I have nominated Bohammed, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bohammed. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 10:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abhisamayalankara

Hi Dawud,

Thanks for the entry on the AA. (It answered my question about who wrote zla-'od.)

However, I would like to draw a few factual errors to your attention.

Asaṅga lived in the 4th century, not the 8th.

Vasubandhu was converted to Yogācāra by Asaṅga, not the other way around.

Asaṅga's commentary is not included in the list of 21 Indian commentaries because no copy exists, not because it comments from the Yogācāra perpective. (In fact, it may never have existed at all, since no other text quotes from it, and the only evidence that it may have existed comes from a cryptic comment by Haribhadra in the verses of praise at the beginning of his "Great Commentary".)

Gelupa writers that I have studied say that the AA is written from point of view of the Yogācāra-svātantrika school. Could you please specify your source for saying that Gelugpas view it as having been written from the Prāsaṅgika perspective.

Haribhadra etc. wrote commentaries on the Ratnaguṇasaṃcayagāthā, not the Dharmasamgitasūtra.

There are a few Tibetan spelling mistakes and inconsistent use of Sanskrit diacritics, but I don't want to nit-pick. On the contrary, congratulations on your effort. And good luck with your AA studies.

ParvatamUDham (talk) 09:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi back, and thanks for writing, and your good wishes. (Do I know you? What do you mean about "Zla'od"?)

I'll try to get to these corrections soon-ish. (I'm particularly embarrassed about the "8th century" blooper.) Please feel free to edit them yourself too--that's kind of what WP is all about. If there are diacritical typos, I'm sure that I will never catch them myself. I know no Sanskrit, and only very bad Tibetan, and in fact only learned what the AA was a few months ago. So do please nitpick.

I assumed that being enlightened and all, Maitreya would have taught it as Prasangika, and that the claim was that Asanga (not so enlightened) misunderstood it as Svatantrika. I'm sure you're right, though--this is just the sort of thing I would be likely to get wrong. Dawud (talk) 03:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Svatantrika

Hi Dawud, thank you for expanding the svatantrika article. It prompted me to also add some detail, which I've been meaning to do for some time but you inspired me finally. I'm worried though that the shentong and yogacara articles have much more detail with respect to svatantrika views and I'm not sure how to refer properly to sections within those articles and avoid duplicating too much information. It's also tricky explaining all the distinctions perhaps between the three articles, and how shantarakshita's synthesis fits in. I'm not sure we really need to create a yogacara-svatantrika-madhyamaka article particularly. But if you have any thoughts on how to properly organize all of that content across all those articles I'd appreciate your thoughts. - Owlmonkey (talk) 17:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Senzar

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Senzar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 02:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pamuk's 'Snow'

You may be interested in my belated comments. --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 20:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image reply from FPMT article & Misc.

Hi, I have recently replied to your request to add images to the article FPMT. Images will be uploaded as soon as possible. Also, I would like to request the speedy deletion of this Wikipedia article. I believe that the information provided in Wikipedia can create serious problems, including the danger of loosing lives and law infringement problems. Firstly, Wikipedia articles are commonly located in the first or second display result in the Google search engine. Had someone really have thought of doing an action like that, the result will/may be horrific. Secondly, in many countries, assisting a person's death is most commonly regarded as illegal. If Wikipedia hosts this article, it means that "it supports it." Wikipedia has continually stated that the law should be followed "in a reasonable manner," especially when dealing with "copy-paste" issues and image copyright situations. Third. For what reasons would Wikipedia.org propose that the article should be included in enbaike.710302.xyz? Whether or not if it is considered appropiate, doesn't this article belong in a "WikiHow" or other sister projects? Please take action as soon as possible. The mission that Wikipedia is to distribute information in a meaningful way. In addition, if Wikipedia.org disagrees on removing the article, that would violate and contradict one of Wikipedia's/Flordia's (database location) policies. I request that this article be removed immediately before any other further harm can be done to the international community. Thank you. Prowikipedians (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Hi. Thank you for your reply, Dawud. Apparently, I've been trying to get that article off Wikipedia, which I believe it serves no purpose what-so-ever. I understand that some people want it their for plain entertainment without considering the consequences and I do understand that it is necessary to go through all those steps...:(. Would it be possible for you to "grab" some people that you know personally and/or some Wikipedians that have a stance for a voting? Thanks. Prowikipedians (talk) 15:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Isn't it ironic that Wikipedia has an article for suicide methods and not homicide methods?

FPMT and misc.

Hi. I left the following reply to your response in the FPMT article talk page.

I agree with you. It has enough sources, particularly from the original FPMT website provides PLENTY of information. Plus, I don't know what else to add here. I think some Wikipedians out here may seem to lack some understanding of the structure of FPMT. Spiritually powerful. Prowikipedians (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Just at a curiosity, are you a FPMT member/follower? Prowikipedians (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maitripa Institute

In the future, use the "move" function to do what you did to move the contents of Maitripa Institute to Maitripa College. This preserves the article's editing history and keeps the talk page attached. If you have some trouble editing over the next few minutes, it's because I'm fixing it. —EncMstr (talk) 04:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhist Studies

Just wanted to say thanks for creating the Buddhist Studies page... I'd created a link to it a few months back knowing it didn't exist but was needed... how wonderful for it to have appeared! --Dakinijones (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of William Melnyk

A tag has been placed on William Melnyk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Journey to the Sacred Garden has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Andrewmc123 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page The Journey to the Sacred Garden. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Andrewmc123 (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Deletion Review

I've removed your request because it was in the wrong section. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisdom University explains why the article was deleted. If you have any issues or feel the deletion was a wrong decision, please consult the administrator who deleted it, User:David Fuchs, and if this doesn't lead to an acceptable result, make a new listing at Wikipedia:Deletion review, following the instructions this time :) Stifle (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the polite note on my page. The article was deleted because it did not have multiple significant secondary sources. In the Articles for Deletion you can find a few passing mentions that could be useful for sourcing, but don't meet the requirements of WP:GNG. If you're going to recreate the article, you need reliable sources that discuss the topic (or aspects of it) in depth and stick them in the article. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 22:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Osel Hita Torres

Thank you for putting back the 'Controversy' section. See my comments in the discussion page. Thanks again. Theravada1 (talk) 22:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fethullah Gulen

Hi can you have a look at the recent history of Fethullah Gülen, and give your opinion on the recently opened case against what I think is a Sockpuppet of Philscirel, the guy who originally wrote the long POV version. You can find the report here. Thanks. Arnoutf (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, too bad Philscirel/Nurefsan is not willing to cooperate. Phislcirel started out as a biased, but promising editor. However, he became more and more aggressive and unwilling to cooperate at the moment several editors started to seriously question his conclusions, use of sources and point of view (at some stage he even implied that he found the long version almost unacceptably biased against Gulen.......). He was blocked for edit warring at that stage and started to edit from several anon IP's, a rather clumsy block evasion (he sometimes even signed...). But even when I warned him just to sit out the 31 hour block he continued sockpuppeteering, and got himself blocked indefinitely. Since then there has been a regular (every 3 months or so) reappearance of the same tactic to reinsert the long text, by a new editor who makes some microedits elsewhere to hide the fact the account was created only for Fethullah Gulen. It is sad indeed as this guy knows something about the issue, but I rather miss out on that input than having the POV pused. Arnoutf (talk) 12:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Collector (2009 film)

A tag has been placed on The Collector (2009 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vinithehat (talk) 21:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Collector (2009 film)

A tag has been placed on The Collector (2009 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vinithehat (talk) 21:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dawud! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 576 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Daja Wangchuk Meston - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gareth Sparham - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Kechara (Buddhist organization)"

A page you created, Kechara (Buddhist organization), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. 95j (talk) 03:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daja

I just finished reading "Comes the Peace: My Journey to Forgiveness". I just learned here at wiki that he committed suicide and am sorry. I wish he stuck around. By the way, it such a coincidence that I read the same books (Cayce, Daja etc)--Jondel (talk) 12:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the article's Porphyrios Bairaktaris name To my mind the name of the article Porphyrios Bairaktaris should absolutelly change to Father Porphyrios or Monk Porphyrios or Elder Porphyrios, because actually he was a very famous Greek monk, that did many miracles and today many consider that he should be nominated as a saint. However, his whole name on the article dosesn't seem to refer to him as a monk but as a citizen! 688dim (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agni Yoga

Hi there. I read what you wrote in the Talk section of Agni Yoga. I'm interested in the book you're speaking about. I quote :

An especially pressing lacuna is the lack of information about AY groups in Russia and Eastern Europe. (I am aware of a new monograph on this from the Gregorian Pontifical University Press, and am waiting for my library to receive it.)

I wonder if you could tell me which this monograph is. Coming from the french wikipedia, we have there the same problem as it occured in english speaking wikipedia about "Living Ethics" (translation of the russian article) and "Agni Yoga", which was formerly erased. So, I'm trying to gather kind of a "corpus" in order to write something which could allow us to avoid a POV. French litterature and second works about the Roerich and Agni Yoga are really poor ; I hope to find more interesting things in english language. Thanks for your help ! Best regards, (coming from the french Wikipedia : FR:Utilisateur:Urobore ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.192.9.125 (talk) 13:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Young Protectors

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Young Protectors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Spiffed up Jan Willis, which you wrote-- take a look! Djembayz (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orthodox Christianity in Taiwan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ramensky, Tianmu and Xindian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christianity in Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodox Christianity in Taiwan

Your recent edit at Orthodox Christianity in Taiwan was recently brought to my attention based on a request for full protection for the page. In the request for page protection, it was claimed that the content your restoring is in violation of the BLP Policy, relevant part being WP:BLPSOURCES. My quick review of the restoration seems to agree, there are both some insufficiently sourced parts, and some negative claims that use sources that are questionable as to being reliable sources. Under BLP policy, the burden is on the proponent of particular content to establish that that content complies with BLP policy. Please do not restore the content until you have started a discussion on the article talk page, and that discussion has reached a consensus in favor of inclusion. (If no one participates, give it a week or two, and then make sure to carefully review the content you want to add to make sure it scrupulously complies with WP:BLPSOURCES. If at all possible, avoid using blogs as sources, no matter how strong the case for reliability may be, as any blog is going to raise a question of reliability. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FPMT Masters Program, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nalanda Monastery (France), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lavaur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Orthodox Christianity in Taiwan. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 14:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

Deletion discussion about FPMT Masters Program

Hello, Dawud,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether FPMT Masters Program should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FPMT Masters Program .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wieno (talk) 03:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FPMT Basic Program for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FPMT Basic Program is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FPMT Basic Program until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wieno (talk) 03:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Andrew Henderson (Nomad Capitalist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Andrew Henderson (Nomad Capitalist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Virginity fraud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virginity fraud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginity fraud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PepperBeast (talk) 11:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]