User talk:Deniskrasnov

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Deniskrasnov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Egmontaz♤ ^talk 14:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Observer-centered formalism

An editor has nominated Observer-centered formalism, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observer-centered formalism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Christopher Thomas (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information about Wikipedia content

While it's good that you're trying to contribute to Wikipedia, you seem to be a bit hazy on what kind of content Wikipedia is meant to include. New scientific results are not the sort of thing that go here; they'd be more appropriately published in peer-reviewed journals. What Wikipedia includes are ideas and results that are well-known already, and that have already been published elsewhere in works that meet Wikipedia's "reliable source" guidelines. The time to write a Wikipedia article about your work is after it's been published somewhere like that, and cited by other scientists in their own works. I hope this advice is useful to you! --Christopher Thomas (talk) 03:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinfo.org

I just happened upon the Articles for deletion discussion regarding the article you recently posted. There is another "wiki" which welcomes editors from Wikipedia and offers different approaches that allow contributors to edit freely. Original research and original ideas are welcome. Here is the link for it: Wikinfo.

According to its pages, Wikinfo allows original research with editor registration. In this way, the author of original research can be talked with, his references talked about and so on, toward arriving at good, created original research. Wikinfo is not just an encyclopedia, because all types of information are allowed including directories of links, dictionary entries, and primary sources.

I hope this is helpful, and it is an opportunity to present your ideas in a venue similar to Wikipedia. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 04:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narratability (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jaaron95 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Narratability and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JAaron95 ^Talk 09:33, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Deniskrasnov, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JAaron95 ^Talk 09:33, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Narratability concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Narratability, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Narratability

Hello, Deniskrasnov. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Narratability".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Di Zhu (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Di Zhu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Deniskrasnov! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]