User talk:DestinationAlan

Replaceable fair use File:Alejandro Sabella during WC 2014.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alejandro Sabella during WC 2014.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SA parliament diagrams

I appreciate your efforts, but they just look horrible. So large. Can't it be compressed to double the width and half the height? Also, the crossbench for the upper house was incorrect, i'm not sure why there was 3 grey. Timeshift (talk) 03:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's one Xenophon Team and one independent, not two independents. Could you try doing the lower house with three rather than four per vertical row? And is there a way to shrink the size of the individual seat/boxes? It's just so so large and unsightly. Timeshift (talk) 03:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'll try three rows. Do you know how to compress things? DestinationAlan (talk) 03:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go to three rows, re-add (just to the lower house article for now) and i'll try some tinkering. Timeshift (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I appreciate your feedback though! It's my first time. Here let me upload it to the Lower House page. DestinationAlan (talk) 03:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just happened to look at your contribution listing and I did notice you're new to this stuff. It's always good to see new, co-operative, productive, consensus-based editors in Australian politics! Bravo! Timeshift (talk) 03:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I uploaded it, made the width slightly longer. DestinationAlan (talk) 03:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still doesn't look good sorry. Can you try two rows please? Timeshift (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that, similar to the structure of the Australian Senate. I'll make the individual seats smaller too. 04:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Excellent. Can you remove the empty space to the right, and above and below though? With the upper, how about just a single row considering it's just 7 and 8? Timeshift (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! I just managed to make the diagram nearly in-line with the House of Representatives one Federally. Tell me what you think now? DestinationAlan (talk) 04:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PERFECT! :D Timeshift (talk) 04:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well that took me awhile! Again I appreciate you guiding my way through this! Though I have a few questions. For example, I need to edit the WA and NSW ones. Do I stay 3 or 4 rows with them as they have more seats? Also, do you have a forecast on the Davenport by-election? 04:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your co-operation! NSW looks fine, WA looks a bit weird to me, could do with the same tinkering. As for Davenport, i'm not sure. It's unique. There's a definite demographic change going on in Davenport, it's not the safe seat (or the same boundaries) as it used to be. When you look at the pendulum, it is definitely the odd one out. Labor actually won the Belair booth at the last election by two votes! It completely changes yet again in a by-election, as like in Fisher, as all the resources are given and concentrated to the one seat, which wouldn't be done at a normal election. Considering the big swing in Fisher, it's not going to be an easy victory in Davenport, but if forced to a prediction, i'd say the Liberals will win it by within a few percent on 2PP. But I wouldn't be all that surprised if Labor or an independent managed to sneak over the line. The Liberals, state and federal, are toxic at the moment. Timeshift (talk) 04:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Demographic changes are something that my electorate is experiencing too. I live in Victoria and we recently went through an election. My electorate is called "Footscray" and it's generally being a Labor stronghold. But this election, even though Labor retained it, we saw a slight jump in percentage towards the Liberal votes. Talk about Gentrification.

Also, it's happening to another electorate federally. "Melbourne Ports". DestinationAlan (talk) 04:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to make the boxes the same size at Parliament of Western Australia? Timeshift (talk) 05:34, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to by putting them both at 250px apiece but it just doesn't work. DestinationAlan (talk) 05:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the lower house graphs from Parliament of South Australia and South Australian House of Assembly as they are now out of date. If you can update them and re-insert them that would be great. Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 14:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First, you took away a vacant but didnt add a lib. Second, not yet. Timeshift (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So can you fix up the lower house graphs from Parliament of South Australia and South Australian House of Assembly? Timeshift (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I've been busy, I'll do them now. 121.219.16.147 (talk) 07:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Timeshift (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the image again as the Libs still had only 20 boxes, not 21. Timeshift (talk) 04:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Hodgett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electoral district of Croydon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bryan Green MHA Portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bryan Green MHA Portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DestinationAlan. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 23:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeremy Hanson ACT MLA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremy Hanson ACT MLA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Matthew Guy MLA Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Matthew Guy MLA Portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Victorian state election, 2014

added links pointing to Electoral district of Richmond, Electoral district of Mulgrave, Electoral district of Croydon and Electoral district of Ringwood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queensland state election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hart (politician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DestinationAlan. You have new messages at Hshook's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Australian Senate image

Hi DestinationAlan, thanks for updating the Australian Senate article with File:Australian Senate March 2015.svg in light of Glenn Lazarus resignation from PUP. However, could you please change the colour of the four independents from pink to grey as shown in the key in the infobox. If you could please make this minor adjustment that would be appreciated. Cheers -- Ianblair23 (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New South Wales state election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Spence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Victorian state election, 2018 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hillary Rodham Clinton Presidential Campaign Logo 2016.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hillary Rodham Clinton Presidential Campaign Logo 2016.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton

You are invited to join WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to American politician Hillary Clinton. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to her. The WikiProject Hillary Clinton group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

For what it's worth, I strongly agree that the Canadian infoboxes are far superior to the Australian ones, and I don't know why you were reverted. If you wanted to have that discussion, as opposed to removing the minor parties, I'd be completely on your side. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Victorian Premiers Timeline Horizontal has been accepted

Template:Victorian Premiers Timeline Horizontal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DestinationAlan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DestinationAlan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Victorian Premiers Timeline Horizontal

Template:Victorian Premiers Timeline Horizontal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Suburban Rail Loop moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Melbourne Suburban Rail Loop, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DestinationAlan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DestinationAlan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]