User talk:DieBuche

de:Benutzer Diskussion:Leo2004
This page is a soft redirect.

Orphaned non-free media (File:NytimesCover12122008.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:NytimesCover12122008.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that medi--Aeron10 (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)a for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Hey there, I saw your addition of the featured picture nomination: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/. That nomination is quite old, and the external link posted there is not a free image, which is a requirement for featured pictures. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to respond here. Thanks! Jujutacular ^T · C 05:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my nomination, i just happened to stumble upon it. Maybe it should be moved; Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ is not the best of all names. cheers --DieBuche (talk) 20:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Edit: Ok, seems to be taken care of.[reply]

Indeed it's not the best name. However, there are a few problems with the nomination. First of all, only local images can be nominated to be featured here. All that was there was an external link. Secondly, the external link pointed to a Flickr page of a non-free image. Non-free images are ineligible to be featured, based on the featured picture criteria, #4. Jujutacular ^T · C 20:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of How to post things on wikipedia

I saw your generic speedy deletion tag on the article How to post things on wikipedia. I replaced it with WP:CSD#G2, because with the title it looked like a test page to me. –Grondemar 08:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion tag on Mokil_atoll

Hi DieBuche. I saw that you had tagged this article - here - for deletion. However, I believe it was a reasonable redirect - which you created - and so I declined the tag. Thanks for your efforts. ceranthor 11:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine --DieBuche (talk) 13:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted the image "gender roles of men" on the page on gender roles

I noticed that you have deleted the image I uploaded on the page on gender roles. The image talks about the common gender roles of men that also act as pressures on their lives, resulting in their oppression. May I ask, why you think this is npov?(Masculinity (talk) 09:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Images

Is there a reason you need File:Krystian Zimerman 2004.jpg and File:Lumholtz's Tree-kangaroo.JPG when File:480px-Krystian Zimerman 2004.jpg and File:488px-Lumholtz's Tree-kangaroo.JPG are already at Commons? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

replied at the admin board--DieBuche (talk) 19:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored more images for you. Nyttend (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pelagic zone image

Hi DieBuche. You replaced File:Wfm pelagic.png with the slightly simplified File:Pelagiczone.svg on a number of articles. However, if you look at how your replacement image displays on these articles, you will notice that it is now difficult to read the text describing the different zones on your revised version. Could you please change the test to a bolder version that is readible at the resolution displayed in the articles. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok, will do --DieBuche (talk) 11:20, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is that better? --DieBuche (talk) 11:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email address

You wrote: "Just go to my talk & click 'E-mail this user' " but I don't see that on your page.

Thank you very, very much. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No idea why it wasn't there, but email is sent.--DieBuche (talk) 11:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got your email and replied. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail: Two rather disgusting images of hagfish. Thank you very much. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMMAGINE&POESIA

Dear DieBuche

As you have suggested, info re criticism ( the existence of 2 art critics and reference to the critical essay in English) has been added. Now - as we have poor experience with Wikipedia rules-, we can't understand what else we have to modify. Would you please tell us what exactly we have to do ? Thanks a lot and sorry to bother you. --Aeron10 (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tinyfish

This is regarding the addition of the Notability tag to the Tinyfish article. The notability has already been discussed Talk:Tinyfish. Please advise what is needed to remove the notability tag. Hoboslobo (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hello, DieBuche. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:29, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Farm

Hello. Thanks again for the uploads. I have a problem. I uploaded Happy Farm 02.jpg for Happy Farm. It got deleted. I am trying to track it down to see why it was deleted. I thought I had done everything right. I just can't find a log anywhere. Can you help? Thanks soooooo much. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

20:15, 3 September 2010 User:Yamla (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Happy Farm 02.jpg" ‎ (F7: Violates non-free use policy: used solely for illustration, not commentary) I don't know the details (not an admin here), you might be best off to ask the deleting user.--DieBuche (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I'm much obliged. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:56, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation for gadget authors

I saw you had done some work on gadgets. We're trying to start a library for gadget authors to use. Please check it out and post any questions or comments there — ☠MarkAHershberger☢(talk)☣ 19:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kerning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Modern paganism page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation marks should not be formatted

DieBuche, I just reverted a change of yours to David Hume where your edit summary was "use typographically correct quotes". Quotes and apostrophes, according to the Wikipedia Manual of Style, should be straight, not formatted, per MOS:QUOTEMARKS#Quotation characters and MOS:PUNCT. So whenever you edit to use "typographically correct" marks, they're actually incorrect on Wikipedia. I notice you've been doing a fair number of these edits, which I'll be undoing so the appropriate unformatted versions are restored. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Labrys

Think the "special characters" are the Linear B syllable signs, not the ordinary Greek alphabet... AnonMoos (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation marks messing up search functions--a thing of the past?

I started a new section on WT:MoS that specifically concerns a change you made to WP:MoS.[1] Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DieBuche. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]