User talk:Dr. Michael Pearce

Welcome!

Hi Dr. Michael Pearce! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JarrahTree 02:11, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoltron has been accepted

Zoltron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating the article. There is no telling how many people on this earth are walking around with his work tattooed on their bodies. Now you need to go through all the articles that mention him and add the blue link.

S0091 (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Michael Pearce (talk) 16:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC) My pleasure! This is very satisfying. I'll do that. :) Dr. Michael Pearce (talk) 16:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dr. Michael Pearce. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

Hi Michael, if you are creating an article on a subject to which you have a conflict of interest, please use AfC and make the appropriate declarations. S0091 (talk) 16:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - I’ve posted a request for editing. I hope I’m doing this correctly. I’ll be sure to avoid the same mistake in future. 2603:8001:B500:C74E:F523:9971:4148:2848 (talk) 18:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael what is your connection to the people you've written about? I'm not asking to incriminate you, I'm just trying to figure out if you're actually in position of conflict of interest or not. Cheers. JBchrch talk 19:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBchrch: I think this is fair question to ask and perhaps I should have been more clear in my note. Michael, it really depends on the relationship you have with a subject and how that may impact your editing about them so please read WP:EXTERNALREL and the sections below it, if you have not already. We do not want you to do through hoops if it not necessary. JBchrch, after Micheal determines one way or the other, is that sufficient you think? S0091 (talk) 20:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the WP:EXTERNALREL link carefully. I have no COI with the Jacaeber Kastor entry, or the Zoltron entry. However, I may now have a COI with the Brian Chambers entry. I write art editorial for art magazines and blogs. I'm a “subject-matter expert” in the field of contemporary art. Recently I wrote a story about NFT's (which is cited in the Chambers entry) and interviewed Chambers. He's quite a character, and I subsequently interviewed him again, and wrote a profile piece about him which will be published this month. I often check Wikipedia when I begin researching a story, and saw that he didn't have an entry, so I put one together. I got on well with him, he liked my work on the stories, and he is now paying me to write a press release and story for him about a show he is opening at his gallery next month. I don’t think there is any bias in the wiki entry I wrote about him – he’s surely a notable person – but at this point I think I may have to remove myself from any further editing to it. Dr. Michael Pearce (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Michael. If you are ever unsure, you can post a note at the Conflicts of interest noticeboard or ask at the Teahouse. You may also consider leveraging/joining WikiProject Visual Arts. S0091 (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]