User talk:Duffy BT
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Duffy_BT. |
Duffy BT, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Duffy BT! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC) |
April 2019
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lewis Carroll, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KNHaw (talk) 01:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 75.191.40.148. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Police, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 75.191.40.148 (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 75.191.40.148. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Police without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 75.191.40.148 (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Police, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. If you can't find a source for "one of the most commercially successful", LEAVE THE TAG OR LEAVE IT OUT.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Police, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 75.191.40.148 (talk) 14:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Live Aid
[edit]Thank you for adding material and sources to this article. However, could you please ensure that you use the correct apostrophes and quotation marks when you add quotes – these should be straight apostrophes and quotation marks (' and ") and not curly/slanted ones (′ and ″). Other editors are having to follow you around and correct your formatting. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Please be mindful of dislodging references when you add new content to a page, as you did on Dracula. It eliminates unnecessary confusion during some review processes. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 02:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)