User talk:Duke Remington

January 2018

Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Steve Whitmire, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Scr★pIron^IV 12:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Steve Whitmire. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 11:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Looney Tunes

Why was my edit reverted? Originally the cancellation status was at the top. Please reply so I know you have read this. Yay Dad (talk) 03:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Originally it was at the top, so, once again, I advise you at once to stop changing the placement of that statement. If you keep reverting the edits, that's edit warring, which is against the rules. Yay Dad (talk) 01:42, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not gonna revert again. You can if you want, but then you would have violate the three-revert rule and will be remove editing right automatically. So your choice. Either be smart or be dumb and get ban. Yay Dad (talk) 02:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, reporting you. Yay Dad (talk) 18:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Pocahontas (character)#Spouse

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pocahontas (character)#Spouse. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith edits on Garfield (character)

Hello, I reverted your good faith edit to Garfield (character). I am pretty sure that "girlfriend" isn't exactly the correct word to use in that article. If you want more discussion on the topic, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Hdjensofjfnen (♪ Oh, can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 21:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pocahontas (character), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Pocahontas (character), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. DMacks (talk) 14:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pocahontas (character), you may be blocked from editing. As before Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why admins let you get away with your racist swinery back in October, but not this time. Drmies (talk) 00:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]