User talk:Dwightforrm
|
July 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wayne Wilderson has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=313900702613&ref=ts.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page The Office (U.S. TV series) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=313900702613&ref=ts.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
October 2017
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hate group. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Jennifer Hale (sportscaster), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atsme✍🏻📧 23:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) (October 23)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Hale (sportscaster), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) (October 23)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Hale (sportscaster), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- I've provided some more news articles. Please add and reference them in your biography for her. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Olivia Dekker moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Olivia Dekker, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Olivia Dekker (January 14)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olivia Dekker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Olivia Dekker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Dwightforrm!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Olivia Dekker (January 14)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olivia Dekker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Olivia Dekker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
You've got Talkback!
[edit]
Message added 23:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hitro talk 23:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Kelly Nash for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Nash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Nash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 22:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Olivia Dekker has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Biblio (talk) 21:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for April 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Jennifer Hale (sportscaster) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to KNOE
- Kelsey Wingert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to ACC
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I wanted to clarify, were the mistakes because I just put down KNOE instead of KNOE-TV? Same with ACC instead of Atlantic Coast Conference. If that's the case I did fix them. If not, I'm sure you'll let me know. Thanks User:Dwightforrm (talk)
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth Prann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HLN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Rachel Barcellona for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Barcellona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Barcellona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QuiteUnusual (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
I believe this page should stay on for a few reasons. 1. Miss Florida pageant hasn't started yet, it's in two weeks. She could be Miss Florida and a Miss America contestant and possibly a Miss America and even if she's isn't I still believe this page is worth keeping. Millions of people have some form of autism and why not a page or several of those who have autism. Inspire people. Plus I'm sure there will be more articles about her in the upcoming days, week. User:Dwightforrm (talk)
The article Nicolette Jennings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:BIO and does not have a notability criteria.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ApprenticeFan work 15:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
I did clean up the references and added one User:Dwightforrm (talk)
Nomination of Holly Sonders for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holly Sonders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Sonders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I have added more including two more references which included her birthdate and the city she was raised in and thought about adding more of her accomplishments from her high school golf career but after the Lauren Sisler page was flagged for adding her awards, I had to cut to a good chunk of the page. I'm afraid to add more of Holly's accomplishments fearing a repeat of Sisler's page. I could see if I find more references on Holly though of all the pages I created I think Holly's is the second-longest I've done. Dwightforrm ( talk )
Now I find about six more references on Holly and added some external links as well. Dwightforrm ( talk )
Brian Kilmeade
[edit]Hi Dwightforrm, I removed your BLP PROD tag from Brian Kilmeade. That tag is explicitly only applicable when the article contains no sources whatsoever; see WP:BLPPROD for the chapter and verse. I think that you would struggle to get the article deleted through WP:AFD, since the subject appears to be notable. If your concern is that the article is not in a good state, I couldn't disagree, but I don't think deletion is the solution. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Alyssa Lang
[edit]Hello, Dwightforrm,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Vermont and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Alyssa Lang should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Lang.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vermont}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Vermont (talk) 02:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
This is getting a little upsetting. I'm still pissed of the Deletion of Holly Sonders and now this. This is BS. Dwightforrm (talk) 03:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Annie Sabo
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Annie Sabo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 04:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I am really getting tired of this bleep, that is all. I would say more but I'm tired at this point. Dwightforrm (talk) 04:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Taylor Bisciotti for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taylor Bisciotti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Bisciotti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello, Dwightforrm
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SportingFlyer and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Brooke Fletcher, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SportingFlyer}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
SportingFlyer T·C 02:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
You had to do this to me on Christmas didn't you SportingFlyer? I'm getting a little tired of this. I'm still pissed over the deletion of Holly Sonders which I had about a dozen references of and Taylor Biscotti. If this keeps up, I will delete pages myself. Dwightforrm 2:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC).
- Sorry mate, just going through the NPP backlog in my spare time, nothing personal. You're free to remove the PROD if you like, but she needs a couple more sources to show she's notable, and I couldn't find any quickly in my search. SportingFlyer T·C 05:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Annie Sabo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
High enough profile that she'll probably be notable at some point, but as of right now there isn't any information about the subject in secondary sources other than routine coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 04:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jane Slater (sportscaster), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kay Adams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashley Brewer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brooke Olzendam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yakima Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justin Hires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gibbs High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jenna Laine
[edit]
Hello, Dwightforrm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jenna Laine".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your draft article, Draft:Jenna Laine
[edit]Hello, Dwightforrm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jenna Laine".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ƏXPLICIT 13:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Allison Kropff for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Kropff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Alyssa Lang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable individual
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 06:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Alyssa Lang for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Lang (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
GraziePrego (talk) 06:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Kelsey Wingert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable individual. The incident with the foul ball is 6 of the references out of 15, and none of the others are substantial coverage about her.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 06:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Kristina Pink has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable individual, no substantial coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 06:47, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Courtney Cronin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable individual
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 06:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Kelsey Wingert for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelsey Wingert until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
GraziePrego (talk) 01:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Dwightforrm. Thank you for your work on Kimmi Chex. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work. Of course, adding an image would be good. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)