User talk:Dylan38

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Pmokeefe. I noticed that in this edit to Fourier complex, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pmokeefe (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was a mistake on my part, I did not realize that material had just been added, please feel free to fix that. It is always a good idea to put in a summary though. Pmokeefe (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dylan38. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dylan38. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Authorities for scientific names

Hi, the authorities of scientific names are always put in small font in the English Wikipedia. This can be done in various ways, via small tags, {{small}}, or special templates like {{Species list}}. See, e.g., the examples at Template:Taxobox#Authorities. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter coxhead – Thanks for the information. The issue is when doing so causes misnested tag lint errors. I would encourage you and others to make sure whatever HTML and/or templates you use do not cause errors that later need cleaning up. Dylan38 (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's the advantage of using {{small}} or {{Species list}} and similar: they don't generate mismatched tags. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Feel free to update any of the pages I've edited with the appropriate, error-free syntax. Dylan38 (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Small question

Why are you removing . . . tags? 203.132.90.143 (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because they are generating lint errors. Dylan38 (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. From reading the section above, it is not preserving formatting. Can you replace:

 → {{small|
 → }}

instead? 203.132.90.143 (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to justify my edits to a random IP. If you have a better solution, jump in and help fix it. Dylan38 (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping formats of  or {{small}} is a valid goal from two editors here seeking a good solution, even if one editor is regarded as second class. Is the replacement suggestion not workable? 203.132.90.143 (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you took the time to actually review my edits, you'll see that the vast majority of them are in circumstances where small font is unnecessary/doesn't matter. The other thing you might notice is that in most cases, the tags surround multiple paragraphs, list items, or other blocks, which is what's throwing the error, and so a simple template replace that you're suggesting is not going to work. Note that in cases where the formatting is important, I have kept or improved it, while also getting rid of the lint errors. But I'm not going to simply replace all tags with a template simply because that's how someone coded it several years ago. If you want to preserve formatting indiscriminately, go for it – I would love the help in clearing out the list of errors I linked above.

In terms of your "second class" status, if you want to be taken seriously, don't use an IP that has only edited things today. Create a username and log in. Dylan38 (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. If you're not going to simply replace all tags, as was done here, then I'm glad.

Taking the time to review your edits is important. That blanket removal of all such tags, whether causing errors or not, is indiscriminate.

I'm also glad for the "second class" in quotes. Anyone can contribute to Wikipedia. 203.132.90.143 (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dylan38,

I'd like to jump in here, but first, thanks for you interest in cleaning up plant pages.

The usual format for synonyms is to "small" the authors rather than the binomial and the authors. (I confess to having done the same thing in the past and getting "pinged" for it!) I'll do a search for the "rule" and let you know when I've found it. Gderrin (talk) 01:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay - can't find the exact "rule" but this comes close (under format:). Also checked out some plant "Featured Articles", including Banksia serrata and Banksia caleyi. You'd think that if the way the synonyms were cited, that someone would have fixed it?

I'm only referring to synonyms of plant names in plant articles, of course. Don't know about other articles. There are probably other plant articles that don't have the authors "smalled" (or the synonyms smalled too) - any help fixing those mistakes would be appreciated. Gderrin (talk)

None of the pages I've edited have had that format, including the one linked above by the anonymous person who started this section. The formatting is actually all over the place in the ones I've edited, with some of them using tags to surround the entire section (which is what throws the lint error), and others using small text elsewise. If you can point to a specific page that I've edited which follows the correct format AND which does not now do so after I removed the small text, then I would be happy to fix it. But my goal here is related to resolving lint errors, not enforcing a format that — as you have discovered — is not formally documented anywhere. Dylan38 (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are about 219,000 articles with automated taxoboxes. Every one that includes authority parameters (most of them) will have the authority displayed in small text automatically, because this is the agreed style since taxoboxes were first used. Manual taxoboxes are present in about 190,500 articles (a slowly reducing number as they are steadily converted to automated taxoboxes). These rely on editors manually creating small text for authorities. In my experience of monitoring taxobox error-tracking categories, the overwhelming majority are correct in this respect. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simply displaying small text properly should throw lint errors. Small text that is misnested will throw lint errors. So long as the automated taxoboxes do not cause lint errors, I will have no reason to visit them, as they won't show up on the misnested tags report. If you've seen me edit any page with an automated infobox that was not causing a lint error, please let me know and I will be happy to fix it. Dylan38 (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan38, did those first two pairs of ... tags that you replaced in the previously linked edit here, enclosing 5 and 2 characters respectively, show lint errors? The instance enclosing a   further down might, but the others?203.132.90.143 (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erin Harkes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erin Harkes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Harkes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]