User talk:Earcanal
Welcome
[edit]
|
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/WP_teahouse_logo_3.png/40px-WP_teahouse_logo_3.png)
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Congrats... You asked an awesome question in the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi! It's obvious you've put a lot of time and energy into the draft article about psychological effects. Thanks for doing that! And also for dropping by the Teahouse to ask a thoughtful question in advance of moving and linking to the article. That kind of attention and effort is going to make you a great editor. Keep it up!
![]() |
Great Question Badge |
Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum. There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn. |
Ocaasi t | c 22:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
The Teahouse Turns One!
[edit]It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!
![]() |
Teahouse First Birthday Badge |
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. |
- --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Your psychology idea
[edit]Hi,
You asked me for my thoughts on User:Earcanal/sandbox.
A couple of things to be aware of:
- Wikipedia does not accept "original research": WP:OR
- All statements in Wikipedia need to be cited (WP:V) to a reliable source WP:RS
In practice, this means that entries like "2 item auditory digit span. No general impairment of learning, comprehension and reasoning." or "STM (impaired)/LTM (spared) distinct. STM as working memory." will only be accepted if a RS says that that's what the paper you're discussing said.
Also, you need to be aware of using green/ magenta for differentiating information; see WP:COLOUR.
I suggest you raise your idea on one or more of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals, and Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals).
If, you get their agreement to proceed, each row of your table should be a templated entry; let me know if you need help with this. Otherwise, you could host the project on a wiki elsewhere, such as Wikia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Earcanal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Earcanal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sāratthappakāsinī (May 19)
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sāratthappakāsinī and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sāratthappakāsinī, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Earcanal!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:35, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Draft:Sāratthappakāsinī concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sāratthappakāsinī, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Your draft article, Draft:Sāratthappakāsinī
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, Earcanal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sāratthappakāsinī".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)