User talk:Editier01

This is Editier01's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bjorn Vidoe (September 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Why have you re-created this?

Qcne (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m another editor working with Vanityorpride who has been paid to edit Editier01 (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Editier01 The draft was rejected yesterday and will not be considered further.

It is against our Terms of Service to accept payments for Wikipedia editing without disclosing this properly.

Tell Bjørn he is not notable enough to have an article. If he has given you money please refund it.

Let me know if you have any further questions. Qcne (talk) 13:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editier01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, Editier01, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Vanityorpride (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Qcne (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disclose that Vanityorpride asked for help to publish the article

how can I disclose ?

cause he has paid for editing and I lost password to my previous account which edited Ambitiouz entertainment Editier01 (talk) 13:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell Bjørn he is not notable enough to have an article. If he has given you or Vanityorpride any money please ensure he receives a full refund.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions. Qcne (talk) 13:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the awards he has won for notability Editier01 (talk) 13:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Editier01 We've been over this. The three awards - the first only mentions him as the composer, the other two don't mention him at all. He has therefore not won any awards. He does not merit an article at this time. Please refund to him any monies paid. Qcne (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check again cause the other 2 mentions him as Sound editor on Food for men

I would have to refund Vanityorpride as Bjorn did not compensate on anything

the article is purely written to provide more information to his fans

after I do research on more awards that link directly to his name can the article be considered? Editier01 (talk) 13:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Editier01 no- there is no indication of notability and he does not merit an article. Refund him any monies paid. Qcne (talk) 13:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor01 has refunded me

how can I get the article created and I just edit ? Vanityorpride (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanityorpride You cannot get this article created. You are free to improve existing articles on the encyclopaedia. Qcne (talk) 13:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do articles on Wikipedia get created if you guys allow editing only ? Vanityorpride (talk) 13:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanityorpride Your question doesn't make sense. Articles are created in the process you attempted - via drafts that are then reviewed and accepted or declined.

Would you like to rephrase the question you have? Qcne (talk) 13:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You’ve answered

I’ll choose another artist create their draft and see after doing research on their awards Vanityorpride (talk) 14:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before you do, very carefully and understand read our notability requirements for musicians or you will just end up with more frustration. Qcne (talk) 14:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend that you don't immediately rush into creating another article. The way you have gone about this so far doesn't instil anyone with confidence that you know what you're doing, and as a paid editor you are inherently tempted to rush things and cut corners because that's what most paid editors do. If you continue to create more promotional drafts with little or no evidence of notability, let alone if you attempt to create articles directly in the main space like you did, you will probably get yourself blocked pretty quickly as a promotion-only account. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Editier01. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Bjorn Vidoe, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Editier01. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Editier01|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Qcne (talk) 13:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editier01, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Bjorn Vidoe on behalf of Vanityorpride for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Editier01 (talk) 13:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bjorn Vidoe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bjorn Vidoe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjørn Vidø. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kabelo Sebake per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kabelo Sebake. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]