User talk:Ehrvkhuletzz

Welcome!

Hello, Ehrvkhuletzz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ervin bobadilla, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jrtayloriv (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

January 2011

Speedy deletion nomination of Ervin bobadilla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ervin bobadilla, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jrtayloriv (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ervin bobadilla, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ervin Bobadilla, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Super Twins. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 04:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ervin Bobadilla, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Calla Lily (TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [1]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Calla Lily (TV series) . Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You continue add the name of an actor for whom you've written an article despite multiple editors reverting those additions. [2], [3]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to First Day High. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [4]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Shake, Rattle & Roll 8. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [5]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Maria Flordeluna. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [6]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Natutulog Ba Ang Diyos?. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [7]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Lokomoko U. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You did so in 3 different edits

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Juicy!. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [8]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Everybody Hapi. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [9]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Midnight DJ. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [10]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Tanging Yaman. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [11]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. None of your edits have had an edit summary. All have been for the same purpose - to add the name of an actor for whom you've written an article, that has already been "speedy deleted" once, to multiple other articles.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Super Twins. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have exceeded 3 reverts in one 24-hour period in this article to add the name of an actor for whom you've written an article, that has already been "speedy deleted" once. [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Katorse, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [20], [21]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ervin Bobadilla, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. All of your edits have been for the same purpose - to add the name of an actor for whom you've written an article, that has already been "speedy deleted" once, to multiple other articles. Please STOP. JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed by administrators

Ehrvhkhuletzz, please see WP:AN3#User:Ehrvkhuletzz reported by User:JoeSperrazza (Result: ). You may add your own response there if you wish. If you will promise to stop warring on this article, you may be able to avoid sanctions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Super Twins. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Same editing behavior that led to block

Speedy deletion nomination of Ervin bobadilla

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Ervin bobadilla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. This is the THIRD time you've created this article, then gone on a spree to add links to it to many other articles. Each time, the article has been deleted, and the links reverted. Please discuss and justify your actions here or on the Article's talk pages. Do not remove the {{db-bio}} tag, as you've done before, or simply keep adding links to this article to other articles. JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Ervin bobadilla, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Super Twins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You were just blocked for making these same edits (unsourced, without explanation in articles' Talk pages, and without edit summary) and no you're doing it again. Please STOP. See Bold, Revert, Discuss and discuss your changes on the Article's talk page. Your edit was: [22] JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Juicy!, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edit was: [23] JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Parsecboy (talk) 15:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Proposed deletion of Bugoy Carino

The article Bugoy Carino has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fæ (talk) 02:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:188080 188112914547774 3947314 n.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:188080 188112914547774 3947314 n.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Mika Dela Cruz. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 11:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. -WayKurat (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding your name when editing articles!

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Mika Dela Cruz. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to use Wikipedia to promote yourself, your facebook account, or anything else associated with yourself. If you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Izzy Canillo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. It is conceivable that your adding your name to articles to promote yourself may at first have been due to lack of understanding of how Wikipedia works, but that is clearly no longer a possibility, and yet you have continued. Considering the number of warnings you have received for disruptive editing of various kinds over the last two months, you are in danger of being indefinitely blocked if you continue. When this block expires please try to edit in accordance with Wikipedia's standards. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat: Do not add your name when editing articles

You've been warned about doing so before - see User talk:Ehrvkhuletzz#Stop_adding_your_name_when_editing_articles.21. Please don't do this [24] again. JoeSperrazza (talk) 02:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain when removing content

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jillian Ward. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Why did you delete "installment.<ref>[http://www.gmanews.tv/largevideo/latest/61921/jillian-ward-steals-the-scene-at-trudis-liit-press-conference/ Jillian Ward steals the scene at Trudis Liit press conference.]</ref>"? The edit in question is [25]. JoeSperrazza (talk) 02:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for continuing with the same kind of disruptive editing as before. Please also take this as a final warning. If you continue to edit unconstructively then you may be blocked indefinitely without further notice. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Izzy Canillo

The article Izzy Canillo has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 18:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Izzy Canillo

The article Izzy Canillo has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 16:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brenna Penaflor

The article Brenna Penaflor has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clarence Delgado

The article Clarence Delgado has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]