User talk:Ejfox

Science Portal

Thanks for changing the featured article!!! Also, very cool site, [ejfox.com], and your wordpress! Or is the wordpress one based on a template? ;) -- Mac Davis] ⌇☢ ญƛ. 08:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Macpolitics

So, how has it been going? Is it still planned? -- User:Mac_Davis

You're so nice :D

Thanks! Amillion 23:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:24137288 8c9fedfd9e m.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:24137288 8c9fedfd9e m.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Regards to HTS rev

Your welcome and I'm just glad to do my best -- Kerowren (talk • contribs • count) 02:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Hammond

Thanks for your thoughtful edits on Jeremy Hammond. I notice that an annon IP recently did some ugly and mean spirited vandalism. I am in Kansas, trying to get into Denver right now and do not have as much access to the internet as usual. This article seems to need lots of watching and nurturing. Glad to have you around. Edivorce 04:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Jeremy

Hello again. I am concerned about some unsourced and POV comments on the Jeremy Hammond page. You have been a solid editor on this page in the past and thought you might be helpful again. I have fact tagged the passages and asked the annon editor to make changes/provide sources. Let's give them a couple of days to reply. Your attention to article in the next few days would be greatly appreciated. Edivorce 17:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fake RootThisBox

Hey can you take a look at this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RootThisBox. -- Kerowren (talk • contribs • count) 01:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HackThisSite.org.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:HackThisSite.org.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 02:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Vex robot.jpg

The file File:Vex robot.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ejfox

A tag has been placed on User:Ejfox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 04:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]