User talk:Elfinshadow

Welcome!

Hello, Elfinshadow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as WooPlus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WooPlus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WooPlus, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WooPlus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WooPlus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WooPlus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 09:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 18:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elfinshadow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi to who's concerned, I am new here apparently, and I am a chubby girl who is a user of WooPlus, the contributions I made to create its page because I simply think there should be more people, especially people like me, wondered to know about this dating app. And there was indeed a lot of talking about this app, I did my work to read some press coverage and a couple of YouTube critics on this app. Since I tried pretty much other dating apps popular in store but found this one is friendly to our plus size girls and easy to use. Being a big girl, it was nice to be on a dating app where people know you’re in a big figure and the reason they are on there is that they love curvy girls like me! There is so much in the media about dieting, weight loss and what a perfect should look like, but WooPlus made it easy for me to be myself, love myself and embrace my curves and also find someone that loves and embraces them too! Yes, I started to create the WooPlus page shortly after I became an autoconfirmed user, maybe I was a little rush on this, but I intended not to stop there, I was going to contribute more to this community. However, I logged in today to found I was banned. It was truly hurt and I would feel sorry if I couldn't be able to make any contribution again. Sincerely hope my ban could be lifted. Elfinshadow (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a product testimonial, not an unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elfinshadow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi again, if I didn't make myself clear enough in the last reason stated, I am truly sorry if it sounded more like a testimonial, it was just my heartfelt words. And I promise that I will stop making contributions to the WooPlus page (even though I still hold the ground that page is necessary to create) as I might be seen suspicious that I don't intend. And I would like to make other constructive contributions to the Wikipedia community if I get unblocked. Like I found its confusing timeline expression in the first introduction part on "F1 in Schools" page, I would like to do some edits and make it easy to follow. I will definitely keep a distance from activities may cause any promotional doubts on me. Thank you.Elfinshadow (talk) 07:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We've seen the "make ten minor grammar edits to get autoconfirmed, then spam away" pattern before. Except you generally made other articles' grammar worse. Either you didn't take the edits you just had to make before you could tell us all about WooPlus seriously, or you lack the competence to edit Wikipedia. Either way, I do not see how unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 23:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Dwaro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]