User talk:EllenZoe

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi EllenZoe! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:18, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi EllenZoe! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:32, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

July 2016

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sadako and the Thousand Paper Cranes (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 23:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good afternoon ^v2.0. Thank you so much for writing to me. I was wondering how the changes I made were reverted back to the old info. I am new to this Wikipedia stuff, and am still learning, and I had no idea a musical genre change would be so controversial. I read a lot of online reference articles, and most indicated that George Winston was misrepresented as a new age artist, and that he created a genre for his music called folk piano. As a matter of fact, in his interviews he only mentions that his music is folk. I can change it again and add a reliable reference. Additionally, Sadako and the Thousand Paper Cranes is a Children record, again I can reference that. The record label is actually Dancing Cat, Windham Hill, not only Windham Hill.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi EllenZoe! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:23, Wednesday, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doug "Danger" Senecal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sturgis, New Castle and I Dare You. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed EllenZoe (talk) 03:12, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link

I am a little confused. My article Doug "Danger" Senecal has links in it, yet I received a notice that my article is an orphan with no links. Can someone help me with this?EllenZoe (talk) 03:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Doug "Danger" Senecal.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Doug "Danger" Senecal.jpg, which you've attributed to Marilyn Stemp. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have contacted the photographer for an email with permission that I will send to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as soon as I receive it. EllenZoe (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sent photographer's permission to use the photo to permissions-en@wikimedia.org EllenZoe (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Doug "Danger" Senecal. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will take note for next time.EllenZoe (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not use thumbnails inside of infoboxes as you did to Le Boeuf Brothers. Note that this is your second warning regarding this issue. Continuing to add thumbnails will be seen as disruptive editing. For more information please see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE. When adding an image, instead of doing:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

You can simply supply the name of the image. So in this case just do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is my second warning. However, I have a problem. If I do as you indicate and not use a thumbnail, the photo comes out huge, and when I put the photo in Commons, it offers a thumbnail to use. Why is this a problem EllenZoe (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-paste of Remy Le Boeuf

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Andy W. (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is great information. Will do EllenZoe (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to George Winston, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. All the content are sourced, and reasons are therefore not valid. Hzh (talk) 20:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Understood thank you. EllenZoe (talk) 14:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lisa Loeb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

got it. thanks. EllenZoe (talk) 14:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Janet Billig Rich

added links pointing to STEP and I'll Sleep When I'm Dead

Lisa Loeb

added a link pointing to Tails

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

untentional on my part thanks for fixingEllenZoe (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hot Octopuss

Hello EllenZoe,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hot Octopuss for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hot Octopuss.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hot Octopuss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Magos Herrera

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.magosherrera.com/index.php?contID=1&fuseaction=home.content. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dianna for reaching out. I did not copy the Magos Herrera bio as you suggested. I used it as a roadmap to find sources to tell the encyclopedic story. I just reread the wiki and did not see what you removed. So I’m hopung all is well EllenZoe (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

EllenZoe (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Thank you Dianna for reaching out. I did not copy the Magos Herrera bio as you suggested. I used it as a roadmap to find sources to tell the encyclopedic story. I just reread the wiki and did not see what you removed. So I’m hopung all is well EllenZoe (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add copyright content to this wiki, not even temporarily for editing. Please do your amendments before you save the page, or use an external editor. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diannna, it should be good now. EllenZoe (talk) 14:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tara Buck Photo.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tara Buck Photo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EllenZoe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kids Saving the Rainforest) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kids Saving the Rainforest, EllenZoe!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article - I think a really great candidate for WP:DYK if you fancy giving it a go in the next few days.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Janet Billig Rich.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Janet Billig Rich.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I will check with the rights holder and see what's up.EllenZoe (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:2018 photo Lathan McKay.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2018 photo Lathan McKay.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick, thanks for the email. The photographer, who is the copyright holder, has assured me that he will send in the permission frm to permissions-en@wikimedia.org right away, within the one week deadline. Given this, do I still need to add a tag to the photo code? EllenZoe (talk) 17:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Christopher Winter artist.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Christopher Winter artist.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Christopher Winter Space Time Reality.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Christopher Winter Space Time Reality.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding from the photographer, who is the copyright owner and the one who gave me permission to use the images, that he sent permission forms in for both these photos. I will check again on this. Thank you.EllenZoe (talk) 15:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Moon Taxi Live Performance.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Moon Taxi Live Performance.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq I think it needs to be deleted and then I'll reload with non-free usage and the permission ticket number. Thanks for the heads up.

File:Silent Night Benefit.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's great thanks. Still learning this stuff. EllenZoe (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gulf Coast Blues and Impressions 2.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Royal Potato Family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royal Potato Family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Potato Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Tara Buck Mathieu Bitton.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Tara Buck Mathieu Bitton.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photographer said she was going to send in the form to permissions-en@wikimedia.org within 7 days.EllenZoe (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Dana Fuchs 2018.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Dana Fuchs 2018.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photographer said she was going to send in the form to permissions-en@wikimedia.org within 7 days.EllenZoe (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Dopapod Band Photo.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Dopapod Band Photo.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Harry Hudson Photo.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Harry Hudson Photo.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The Revivalists Group Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Revivalists Group Photo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WHile I appreciate your comments Whpq, I feel that the photo is useable as is mostly because the work has been publicist and publicly displayed outside Wikipedia by (or with permission from) the copyright holder, or a derivative of such a work created by a Wikipedia editor. While another photo would suffice in the spot, this is the most relevant and clear and lo-res I was given by the owner of the copyright. EllenZoe (talk) 18:31, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Revivalists, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conan and Sleigh Bells (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out. I fixed them both. EllenZoe (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Revivalists Group Photo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EllenZoe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Lathan Mckay.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Lathan Mckay.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS received}}, indicating that a statement of permission had been received by permissions-enwikimedia.org, but that this email was insufficient in some way

This could be due to any of several issues:

The OTRS agent might have asked for further information to validate the ticket, but no follow-up reply was received (this is the most common reason).
The license submitted might not have provided an acceptable free content license. (Statements of permission that allow only usage on Wikipedia or only non-commercial usage are NOT sufficient.)
The person who submitted the statement of permission might not be the copyright holder or might not have been able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the OTRS agent that they own the copyright.

Due to privacy reasons, we cannot comment on Wikipedia with the exact reason that the ticket could not be processed.

If YOU submitted the ticket to the permissions address, please search your email for a reply with the ticket ID - a reply was sent some time ago requesting more information or further actions needed to confirm permission. Please reply to that message.

If the copyright holder (not you) submitted the ticket, then that person received a response (which may have been some time ago). Please ask them to follow up.

If another message is sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-enwikimedia.org that resolves the problem, please let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eleven Seven Label Group, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages All That Remains, Deuce and Art of Dying (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

all fixed thanks. EllenZoe (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Rita Wilson 2018.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rita Wilson 2018.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Socks

Thank you for your hard work, but please try to be a little more circumspect when making major expansions to artciles as you did with Happy Socks. If you compare your expanded version to the version after I have "tweaked" it, you will see that I have had to remove a certain amount of promotional language and name-dropping. This is the sort of editing we typically see from those with a conflict of interest, and the article is still too effusive. I am not suggesting a COI here, but it is all too easy to slip into parroting the marketing speak so prevalent today, even in reliable sources. And do read WP:OVERLINK too. Edwardx (talk) 13:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edwardx Thank you for your kind explanation. I have done quite a few Wikipedia updates and additions, but I feel everyday I'm still learning the ropes. May I ask you why you deleted the names of the artists who have created socks styles for Happy Socks? They are very popular celebrities and thought that was fascinating. EllenZoe (talk) 14:10, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Breskin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dean Young and Matt Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Group shot of Hippo Campus band.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Group shot of Hippo Campus band.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ghost-Note band photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ghost-Note band photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EllenZoe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unbeknownst to me, somehow my IP is now going through the United Kingdom even though I live in Costa Rica. I did not change anything on my computer, I just opened it up this morning and everything is haywire. I would like to be unblocked as soon as possible as I want to resume my edits. Please advise EllenZoe (talk) 13:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. If you are using a proxy or a VPN, please disable it and try again in 24 hours. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deletion pending for File:Lathan McKay 2019.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Lathan McKay 2019.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesse & Joy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Joe Poletto

Hello, EllenZoe,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Joe Poletto should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Poletto.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creep^Talk 11:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your sterling work and civility in trying to save the Joe Poletto article from deletion, while the deletion discussion was proceeding. scope_creep^Talk 16:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: Thank you I appreciate all your help. It was a learning experience for me. EllenZoe (talk) 18:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ricky Byrd, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dion and Mark Hudson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KC Porter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algerian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Like a villain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Like a villain, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 07:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DaiyushaYikes, I wasn't thinking. I am writing this page its DEFINITELY not meant to be a regular page. I will move it right away to my sandbox. So sorry, where was my mind?EllenZoe (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Marieme 2020.jpg

Hello, EllenZoe. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Marieme 2020.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Biophilia Records logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Biophilia Records logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official logo for The Wiseman Group.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official logo for The Wiseman Group.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Three Wishes food company logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Three Wishes food company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)j[reply]

Draft:Three Wishes (food)

User:Meloncoco I saw today that you did some work on this page that I created via its location in a Draft file. Currently, I am blocked at the suggestion of MER-C, and waiting for my appeal to be reviewed by an administrator. Today User:DragonflySixtyseven an administrator reviewed the page, but I am unclear what he or she thought. I have no relationship with the creators of the cereal, other than asking them for their logo for the page, which has been removed from the draft page. I think your additions of sources were very helpful and flattened the tone so it doesn't sound like an advertisement. How do I get the article moved from Draft back on Wikipedia? Is that something you can do or maybe User:DragonflySixtyseven? As I said, I am blocked, and distressed because I love this Wikipedia stuff and want to keep doing it, but cannot. EllenZoe (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Concord (entertainment company) logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Concord (entertainment company) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello EllenZoe. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:EllenZoe. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EllenZoe|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 08:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 11:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EllenZoe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not ever been a hired editor by any of the subjects I have written about or edited and certainly not received money. I think the problem may be the fact that I was a publicist in entertainment public relations for nearly 30 years, so perhaps my text tone may sometimes sound promotional out of habit, and perhaps the references are not the best. On occasion, I do contact a subject's publicity firm, or management company for a photo. I am no longer in the entertainment industry, and have been living in Costa Rica as a travel agent for 20 years. I have found a number of my articles in Draft file. My most recent non-entertainment article was Three Wishes (food) and to be honest all the articles I found on Three Wishes cereal did sound promotional but I figured that was how to do a product, a product I use and love personally. There are others in the Draft file, but I am unclear as to why or how to get them out. Please unblock me from editing so I can continue doing what I love. From now on, I will put my articles through AFC if that helps. EllenZoe (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second look at my block please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EllenZoe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon administrators. It has been 3 weeks since I put in my plea appeal to remove my block. I am unhappy that my errors with a few pages caused me to be unable to continue working on Wikipedia. As I stated, I had a career in public relations for 30 years and my writing style in Wikipedia occasionally was in a promotional tone with sources that reflected that. I am well aware of what I did and if I can get unblocked will be extra careful to neutralize my tone, and avoid any writing that seems advertising-like. Can someone help me with this situation? Thank you so much. EllenZoe (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Luz Mendoza 2019.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luz Mendoza 2019.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EllenZoe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing again to be unblocked. I received a Procedural decline to my first request from @NinjaRobotPirate:. I have come to understand that my writing style in the last few pages was promotional and advertorial. I believe I can adjust my style to be in line with Wikipedia and would be happily willing to go back to those pages moved to the Draft file and rewrite them. I have contributed many many pages to Wikipedia in line with the philosophy of free information via writing and editing. I, in no way, want to violate the policies of Wikipedia and would not take money if offered. I will also find alternative ways to get information rather than contacting the subject or public relations firm of the subject. I understand this is why I was blocked and did not mean to cause problems. EllenZoe (talk) 2:17 pm, 14 September 2020, Monday (9 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Clear signs of paid editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you identify what types of articles you would be interested in editing if you were to be unblocked? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon @Rosguill:. Thank you for getting in touch about this block. I have interest in creating pages in the arts - from television, music and film - in personnel and the art itself. I am a bit of a pop culture junkie. Also, I like to write about philanthropic organizations like my page Kids Saving the Rainforest, an animal rescue and environmental group. I realize that most of what I've done is create pages, or update entertainment-related pages. In order to become more useful to the Wikipedia community, I will do more random editing including those on AFC, and elsewhere. I really want to be of service to Wikipedia. EllenZoe (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your stated fields of interest coincide with topics that are frequently targets of promotional editing. Would you be willing to agree to not edit any articles about living people, media released in the last ten years, or currently active organizations bands and TV shows for the foreseeable future? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I guess if that is required of me I would acquiesce @Rosguill:. The things you are asking me not to do are the most fun, and things I know about the most. I will do as you ask. One thing, can I do the arts topics if I put them through AFC to show I am not affiliated? I am willing to do what I have to do to get back into this with Wikipedia, so if the answer is the avoidance of what you are asking, then of course I'd do it.EllenZoe (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MER-C, any thoughts on potential unblocking conditions as the blocking admin? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Please note that this user was hired to create Dave Kaplan (music executive) through a freelancing website and the job is still in process. Let me know if you want evidence or ask MER-C for the same. Thank you. GSS ^💬 03:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS:I am not sure what you are talking about. I, too, would like to see this "evidence". As to why I chose the subject, I knew of the company through my years in music public relations and I am a surfer here in my country, and so is the subject, which is another way I know of him. I am not now working on that page anymore since the block. It was moved to a Draft file. Perhaps someone else is working on it? If this is the source of my block then I am being unfairly accused.EllenZoe (talk) 04:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please disclose where did you get this image from and why you hired another freelancer to review the page which is a violation of WP:SOCK? GSS ^💬 04:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: Wow, this is getting crazy. I contacted Surfdog Records and asked for the photo of Dave Kaplan to use on the page. I have NO IDEA what you are talking about my hiring another freelancer to work on the page. Freelance writer? My real name is Ellen Zoe Golden, so you can check that I don't even know what website you are referring to. I do know some other editors but have NEVER hired anyone to work on this page. Do you think maybe you have me mixed up with someone else? I suspect you think I am an employee of Surfdog. I am a travel agent in Costa Rica for a company down here. EllenZoe (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: I am completely flabbergasted that you can declind me on Wikipedia based on accusations that have no basis in truth. If I were paid to do something, I would use AFC and indicate a COI. How is it possible that someone here can make accusations without any evidence or proof? It's feels I am being punished for something I didn't do. The reason I gave my real name was for you to google me and see that I am an honest, reputable person. I am super bummed out right now. EllenZoe (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reluctant to unblock because there are additional red flags. If you do unblock, then the only acceptable condition would be a prohibition on editing about any attention seeking entity - no BLPs, no companies, products, bands, non-profits, etc unless defunct. There is no surefire way to verify that EllenZoe is telling the truth without violating the harassment policy, and all spammers are liars (some more convincing than others). MER-C 16:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Having received an email from GSS with the details of this case, I agree that the chances that this editor wasn't engaging in UPE are extremely slim. That having been said, if they do agree to the above conditions to not edit any content that could conceivably be commissioned, there's little additional harm that they could do. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: @Rosguill: I would agree to those terms. I would need to know if that is a permanent condition or a probationary requirement. Why does GSS have evidence that I cannot see or refute? I don't know what he could possibly have that has raised the red flag on me. I do feel I am being harrassed. I have stated from the beginning that I retired from the entertainment industry over 10 years ago, though know how to reach out to get photos and bios on subjects. I was a publicist, thus writing in a promotional style. I am totally willing to revamp that style. I NEVER thought that entering into the Wikipedia editing process would result in a disparaging of my character and a question of my honesty. EllenZoe (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't share the evidence because that would make it easier for people who professionally run sockfarms to abuse the website to learn how to cover their tracks. There really isn't anything for you to rebut either, other than to say "I didn't do it", which you already did. Your pattern of editing is highly similar to what we would expect from a paid editor, so a disavowal isn't terribly convincing. Because of this, the conditions of the conditional unblock have to be indefinite; you may be able to appeal at some point in the future, but only after demonstrating significant positive contributions within the parameters of the conditional unblock. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood @Rosguill:. I cannot defend myself and my integrity further. What a system. Okay, I'll agree to the terms you have laid out.EllenZoe (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've gone ahead and removed the block under the aforementioned conditions. You can appeal the block at some point down the road either directly to me on my talk page or at the administrator's noticeboard. Appeals will be evaluated both on the basis of the amount of time elapsed and the quality of your contributions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Rosguill:. I really appreciate getting a second chance. I hope to prove myself and my work worthy. EllenZoe (talk) 19:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Woodland Strykers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Woodland Strykers, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Amkgp: I had meant to put it in my sandbox. I will work on it in Draft. Thank youEllenZoe (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your edit to Draft:The Woodland Strykers has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: I thought the draft file was where I could work on my text. That is why I copied the information to save there while I looked around for more sources. It was not placed there with the intention of using it, but to use it as a reference when I wrote more on the page. I think I will take all the text and move to my sandbox, so I can work on the text and reference it without violating policy. I NEVER intended to publish that information as it was put in the draft. Just use it as a reference.EllenZoe (talk) 19:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright material is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia, not even in sandboxes or drafts. Sorry.— Diannaa (talk) 19:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Okay, gotcha. Thanks for helping me understand. EllenZoe (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peggy Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Song of the Year.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Wiseman Group

Hello, EllenZoe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Wiseman Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Three Wishes (food)

Hello, EllenZoe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Three Wishes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wiseman Group (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The group is notable , but the article as currently worded is not encyclopedic.

I think the way to handle it is to be more selective in what is listed.

In section 4, it is important to know if the award is notable enough for us to have a Wikipedia page on it. If we do, link them at first mention. Each award also required a 3rd party reference. And merely being listed as one of a hundred designers is not a particularly impressive award. We want awards that he wins.
In section 5, each project also requires a third party reference. It is extremely important to know if theproject received an award.
In section 6, what's the significance of merely being included in a Showcase? Do we have articles on them? And again, we need references.

Are any of their projectsd notable enough for us to have a WP article on them? Are any of the principals?

In addition, the books can be better evaluated if we know the publisher and the author, so please list them in full bibliographic format (get the info from Worldcat, not Amazon).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wiseman Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I want to encourage you to finish this as well as possible

DGG ( talk ) 23:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Broadening my editing and writing

@Rosguill: It is coming up on 6 months since my priviledges were reinstated with the condition that I would focus on deceased or defunct subjects. I have abided by those conditions, creating a couple of pages, and thoroughly editing others. It's been fun, but a bit difficult to find these kind of topics that were not already created. I was hoping that I could now broaden my scope and work on more subjects. Please adviseEllenZoe (talk) 21:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EllenZoe, you've done some decent work, such as your edits at Peggy Lee and Actors' Colony, but I'm concerned that last week you were working on Draft:The Wiseman Group, which appears to be a violation of your unblock conditions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: I received a message on my talk page about The Wiseman Group draft nd I thought I was indicating that I needed to work on the page. So I took out a bunch of unsubstantiated stuff that I had found on the firm's website and resubmitted for approval. I thought since I was contacted about it by a Wikipedia editor that I was asked to fix it. My mistake. Also, did you see my Woodlands Strykers page too and Shotgun Messiah who broke up years ago?EllenZoe (talk) 16:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's an understandable action so I'm not going to enforce the violation with a further block, but it is a violation of the terms of your unblock. I think you're on the right track, so given another month or so I would be inclined to remove the restrictions if you keep up the good work. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @Rosguill: I appreciate the guidance. EllenZoe (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Woodland Strykers

Hello, EllenZoe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Woodland Strykers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back in full Wikipedia editing

Hi @Rosguill: Since we last communicated I've found a defunct business and a deceased person whose pages needed work, and I did it. At this point, I am asking to have all my privileges restored to edit and create Wikipedia. I look forward to hearing from you and getting further guidance in order to improve Wikipedia to the betterment of all. EllenZoe (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While you've done some good work, I'm not seeing enough to make me feel comfortable rescinding the unblock conditions. You are allowed to appeal the conditions at WP:AN, although I doubt that you will receive a different answer there. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Woodland Strykers

Hello, EllenZoe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Woodland Strykers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dave Kaplan (music executive)

Hello, EllenZoe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dave Kaplan (music executive), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wiseman Group (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject has potential, but the current information does not clearly establish notability. Background to the company has few citations; the quotes add little insight. The book listing does not explain its relevance - are these written by the company's employees, or do they include details of the company's work? If the latter, they could potentially be used as references so long as they cite the company but details (chapter/section titles, page numbers, etc) would need to be added. Books, projects and awards should be presented in chronological, not reverse date order.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wiseman Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Wiseman Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 11:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EllenZoe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul W (talk) 11:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, EllenZoe

Thank you for creating Tina Bell.

User:Robert McClenon, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

See also Draft:Tina Bell.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Robert McClenon}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 12 July 2021

{{Re|Robert McClenon}} I will indeed review the Draft:Tina Bell again and utilize some of the information that comes from reliable sources. Many of the references were not, in my opinion, reliable, yet, there are some I can use with the added info. I will look this over now and work on the Tina Bell page. Thank you so much for making me aware.EllenZoe (talk) 15:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full editing benefits

@Rosguill: I have been doing more editing of deceased subjects and defunct businesses, as you will see. Do you think now enough time has passed and the work sufficient in order to restore my full editing and writing benefits? Thank you in advance for considering this. EllenZoe (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EllenZoe, I'm afraid I'm quite busy with off-wiki work this month and can't commit to reviewing your recent contributions. You can request to appeal the restriction by starting a thread at WP:AN. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dave Kaplan (music executive)

Hello, EllenZoe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dave Kaplan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 09:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]