User talk:ElvisThePrince

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 15:07, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for looking at my RfC and giving an honest assessment. The fact is that I have been agressively coming back at Jemptymethod since he started accusing me of putting a map to his house on his talk page using a sockpuppet that clearly belongs to Catmistake. I've tried to convince Jemptymethod that he can indeed go to the police to get a court order for the information to find out just who posted that map. Instead, he continued to slander my name so I came back at him agressively. If you look at Jemptymethod's talk page history, you will see that I first came at him civily, but as he continued to threaten me and get agressive, I did the same. As he started stating that he was doing google searches for me, I started doing google searches for him. As he started posting my name on Wikipedia and threatening to call my employers and give them the same nonsense he's feeding me, I started hosting his name and the information I found about him. I demanded an appology because he's already slandered me. I will continue to badger him until he either shuts up or appologizes and agrees to seek his vendetta against Catmistake with the right authorities. In any case, I do agree that I've not behaved 100% as I should have and I do agree that it took me a while to mellow out here, but the only person that I didn't deserve to get any crap from was the one person that continues to harass me. Anyway, thanks again for the honest assessment without the bias. I appreciate your taking the time to look at the history. - Sleepnomore 06:02, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User:girlvinyl

Thanks for your message. I didn't even know that that page exists. 2004-12-29T22:45Z 23:32, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

warning people

whoops, overlooked that, thanks for the warning before someone yells at me. cheers. Sasquatch讲看 03:00, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

wards of bradford

Well I've sourced them all. I'm fairly happy with them now, a few could do with expanding the description (all 3 Keighley, Toller) which leaves Clayton, Ilkley, Manningham & Shipley where there were already substantial articles. I suppose it's time to wp:be bold and create sections on each about the wards, what do you reckon? As for you putting the sources in, I'm sure you could have guessed what I used. You created the template in the first place anyway. --MGSpiller 21:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I also completly forgot about http://www.bradfordinfo.com/census/WardProfiles.cfm which has the data accesabile in something other than IE, (the profiles may be worth basing some of the "qualitative" information for each ward on as well.--ElvisThePrince 22:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yorkshire

Thanks for the support regarding the county status of Yorkshire. I'm presuming you also stick by the policy on counties found at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places).

I'm reviewing the situation on the unusual edits to lead sections and have contacted the user in question. Thanks for the support again however, do get in touch should you wish to discuss this further. Jhamez84 14:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actualy I'm just trying to follow common sense rather than any policy per se, and the fact that the council refers to iteself as Bradford, West Yorkshire.--ElvisThePrince 14:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm personally inclined to think the policy is common sense and shouldn't be necessary in the first place! Thanks, however, Jhamez84 14:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Special school

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Special school. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special school. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:UK ward

Template:UK ward has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox UK ward. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Temporal User (Talk) 07:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ElvisThePrince. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]