User talk:Emma Bosch

Emma Bosch, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Emma Bosch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hitting Town (1975) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hitting Town (1975). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 19:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question

Hi Emma. I've left answer to your question at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Draft page: Received a message "specifically needs major reviews". Best, Voceditenore (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hitting Town (1975) has been accepted

Hitting Town (1975), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Emma Bosch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing references

Please STOP removing references, without any explanation it is VERY disruptive. Theroadislong (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I want to take out the references to stephenpoliakoff.com as I received a message from you explaining that it exhibits a conflict of interest. As I am inexperienced I don't understand that I am disrupting things. Can you help correct the article's references?

Thanks Emma Bosch (talk) 14:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The message says nothing about references using the subjects website? In any case with your clear conflict of interest you are encouraged to propose changes on the talk pages of affected article(s) rather than edit them yourself in future. Theroadislong (talk) 14:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strawberry Fields (1977) (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Conceivably notable but needs all significant news and reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strawberry Fields (1977) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shout Across the River (1978) has been accepted

Shout Across the River (1978), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strawberry Fields (play) has been accepted

Strawberry Fields (play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]