User talk:EmpAhmadK

Welcome!

Hello, EmpAhmadK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! !dea4u 09:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Gabungan Baharu"

Hey there, it'd be great if you could provide a source that says the name of the new governing coalition in Johor is called "Gabungan Baharu". The only sources that mention "Gabungan Baharu" are Malay language news sources, which leads me to believe the usage of "Gabungan Baharu" is just to denote the fact that the coalition is new. Sisuvia (talk) 04:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. At the moment, I do not have any English information, however, during a press conference at his residence earlier today, Johor Menteri Besar, Hasni Mohammad, when asked regarding the official name of the coalition, explained that they are still called "Gabungan Baharu", and they are waiting for the federal government to determine whether or not the state government in Johor should use the same name or not.

He said: "What we all know right now is that we have a federal government and state governments. I would like to ensure that the state government (of Johor) and the federal government shall be able to work together as a team, helping each other out; and so we chose to let the federal government choose to name this government, whether or not shall we use the name "Perikatan Nasional" as the name for this coalition. We shall wait until the federal government make their decision."

Original untranslated transcription: "Yang kita semua sedia maklum bahawa kita ada kerajaan persekutuan dan kita ada kerajaan-kerajaan di peringkat negeri. Adalah menjadi hasrat saya untuk memastikan bahawa kerajaan negeri dan kerajaan persekutuan itu akan dapat berkerja sebagai satu pasukan yang saling bantu-membantu, dan kita memilih untuk memberi kerajaan persekutuan terlebih dahulu untuk menamakan gabungan yang ada sama ada akan meneruskan Perikatan Nasional sebagai nama gabungan baharu; kita akan tunggu sehingga kerajaan persekutuan membuat keputusan."

A recording of the press conference can be found here, and the part I mentioned was at minute 15:23.

English news sites (and even Malay) tend to use "Perikatan Nasional" due to a common misconception that they are indeed called that. However, since the government was formed before the Perikatan Nasional government was officially formed on the 1st of March, they did not use the name Perikatan Nasional. In the Johor Palace's statement announcing the formation of the new government, they wrote "gabungan baharu" when denoting the fact that it is a new coalition, and "Gabungan Baharu" when referring to the coalition since it is the name of the coalition/a proper noun. Thanks. EmpAhmadK (talk) 10:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks. Sisuvia (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of Perikatan Nasional

Hello, I note that PN has changed their logo to be plaintext only, as seen from this photo from the unveiling ceremony.

I have created a near SVG replica of it (PNG version here) with the correct font glyphs, but considering you are the uploader of the Perikatan Nasional logo (which is very nice, compared to the plaintext version), would you consent for me to overwrite it, or would you wish to upload your own version? Seloloving (talk) 00:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Yes, you may overwrite my upload, I believe that would be easier as we won't need to replace the images where it has been used. Although I think the colour of the field may be adjusted according to the image from this news article. Thanks for the heads up! --EmpAhmadK (talk) 02:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EmpAhmadK - should I use the colour of the clean image (presumably from a source, though Google has not turned up anything) or the one from the photo I linked? Seeking your recommendation as they are both from Malaysiakini. Seloloving (talk) 03:08, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Seloloving - I think using the colour of the clean image (#003152) would be better since it would match with what they use, since it's also the same one used by Perikatan Nasional members (e.g., Deputy Minister of Youth and Sports as seen here). But I guess it would be up to you since you're uploading it. I think a slight difference in the colouration doesn't matter since they haven't specified the specific colour code yet. -- EmpAhmadK (talk) 13:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pan-Malaysian Islamic Front, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 10:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Centre for Foundation Studies (IIUM) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Centre for Foundation Studies (IIUM), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Centre for Foundation Studies (IIUM)

Hello, EmpAhmadK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Centre for Foundation Studies (IIUM), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centre for Foundation Studies (IIUM) (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage needs to be independent not sourced to International Islamic University Malaysia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centre for Foundation Studies (IIUM) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 07:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EmpAhmadK! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 07:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Prince Henry of Prussia (1862–1929)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Prince Henry of Prussia (1862–1929), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Prince Konstantin of Hohenlohe-Waldenburg-Schillingsfürst

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Prince Konstantin of Hohenlohe-Waldenburg-Schillingsfürst, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 21:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the reminder. I'll try my best to do so in the future. EmpAhmadK (talk) 11:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]