User talk:EmyRussell

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DMCA takedown notice

Hello, EmyRussell.

My name is Maggie; I work for the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm sorry to have to tell you that I have had to remove part of the content you put into Rankings of universities in the United Kingdom on instruction of our legal department based on a long-running dispute that would be hard for a newcomer to be prepared for. The issue is that we received a letter from News International (who own The Times and The Sunday Times) demanding that we remove reproductions of their rankings, which they claim violate their copyright. I'm required to give anyone who adds the content in whole or in part, including updated versions of the content, the notice below (which is a form letter) letting them know their legal rights. Given the inclusion of this information from other publications, it's perfectly natural to assume that this, too, can be added, but until their legal claim is challenged, we are required to remove this content.

You may also want to review WP:TOP100 for community guidelines on the issue, including why even including partial lists of this type when creatively compiled may not be possible.

This situation is quite rare, and I'm sorry that you were caught up in it. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 20:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

required notice

The Wikimedia Foundation (“Wikimedia”) has taken down content that you posted at Rankings of universities in the United Kingdom because someone alleged that your post infringes on a copyright.

You can see their communication here: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:DMCA_News_International.pdf

When someone makes a validly formulated notice of copyright infringement, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) requires Wikimedia to take the content down and to notify you that we have removed the content. This notice, by itself, does not mean that anyone is suing you. The take-down requestor might only be interested in removing the content from our site.

What Can You Do?

You are not obligated to take any action, but if you feel that your content does not infringe on any copyrights, you can contest the take-down request by submitting a ‘counter-notice’ to us. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position and you may wish to consult with an attorney. If you submit a counter-notice, the alleged copyright holder can stop us from restoring the content by suing you. Please note that Wikimedia will not be a party to any legal action that arises from you sending a counter-notice, and that Wikimedia is unable to provide you with legal advice.

Filing a Counter-Notice

If you choose to submit a counter notice, you must send a letter to legalwikimedia.org asking Wikimedia to restore your content. The letter must comply with DMCA standards and must contain the following:

A link to where the content was before we took it down;
A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you believe the content was taken down mistakenly;
Your name, address, and phone number;
If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court in the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; or if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where I can be found”; and finally,
Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, Wikimedia must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter-notice and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter-notice. We will restore the content you posted within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days, provided that the alleged copyright holder does not give notice of suit to restrain re-posting of the material.

Miscellaneous

As a matter of policy and under appropriate circumstances, the WMF will block the accounts of repeat infringers as provided under the DMCA.

If you would like to learn more about Wikimedia’s policies, please refer to the Wikimedia Terms of Use, available at http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_use and the Wikimedia Legal Policies, available at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/Legal_Policies. More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:

Reference issue on University of Bristol

Hi, You seem to do lots of updated of rankings of universities on various league tables. On the University of Bristol article Reference 15 is showing a error " Cite error: The named reference THE_World_University_Rankings_2015-16 was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." I think it was this edit of yours which updated a reference from 2013-14 which was previously included but leaves <ref name="Academic Ranking of World Universities 2015_UK"/> with no URL to link to. Could you update to an up to date link?— Rod ^talk 20:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am a member of the WikiProject Universities, I would appreciate your honesty if you have an issue with me updating various league tables. Thank you for the note, I have amended the citation now. EmyRussell (talk) 23:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with you updating the league table bits & welcome someone keeping them up to date. I only found the referencing error because it showed up on the Bristol cleanup list which I keep an eye on.— Rod ^talk 07:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad to hear of this - apologies for the misunderstanding.EmyRussell (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EmyRussell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

University of Warwick

Hi EmyRussell, thank you for fixing my mistake on the List of UK universities by endowment page. I don't know why I chose the consolidated endowment in this case. Many thanks Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AloneintheWild, thank you for your message. For most universities, their endowment reserves are the same for Consolidated and University. It's only a few universities where Consolidated and University endowment figures are different. Reading, for example, has a very significant difference between the two figures (£206.9m against £14.8m for 2015/16) so it was decided that University endowment reserves should be used. Of course, I am open to discussing whether the 'Consolidated' figure should be used instead and we can discuss it over on the List of UK universities by endowment Talk page. EmyRussell (talk) 19:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm in agreement with you. I think Warwick is like Reading in this respect, there is quite a difference between both figures. I think the current method of sticking to one consistent figure is simpler. I remember the amount of articles on which I updated the endowment figures and found confusion with income was astonishing. Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's very good to hear. I will continue to update the UK University Endowment page as I have been doing then. I appreciate your feedback.EmyRussell (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester grades

Hi, with regards to your recent edit on the Manchester university page should we remove all reference to A-level grades given that UCAS points can come from a wide range of sources? EvilxFish (talk) 13:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for your message. I personally think it should remain as it is, i.e. show UCAS points by A Level and AS Level, as the majority of entrants will be British, therefore will have taken A Levels. This will be useful for prospective students viewing the page. Since most students take 5 AS Levels before dropping to 3 A Levels, I think the current system provides a good indicator. The source, CUG, state that UCAS points are calculated from examination results only, e.g. A Levels, International Baccalaureate, Scottish Highers, Cambridge Pre-Us etc. EmyRussell (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EmyRussell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

updated endowment figures Cambridge

Sure, net assets aren't equal with endowment figures but you just added the University's restricted endowment (1,728 ) to the unrestricted (3,033) and voila 4.9 despite the linked Reporter is pretty clear on the fact that not all colleges invest with the University investment fund - starting with Trinity and its more than 1 billion endowment...

This was not how Cambridge's endowment was calculated. It was a result of the sum of colleges' endowment of £3,149.3M plus the central university system's (consolidated) endowment of £1,728.0M equalling £4,877.3M. The source on Cambridge University's wikipedia page states this.EmyRussell (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

University of Bristol

Thanks for the update to University of Bristol. You obviously know lots about these league tables and I was wondering if you knew what would have been referenced as "Complete League Table 2018"? Ref 89 on the article says " Cite error: The named reference Complete League Table 2018 was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." and I thought you might know what source this should be citing?— Rod ^talk 15:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for raising this. I have now corrected the cite error and updated consequently.EmyRussell (talk) 16:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.— Rod ^talk 16:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EmyRussell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Endowments for colleges

Thanks for adding endowment figures to the articles for various Cambridge colleges last year. I've now added an endowment field to Template:Infobox residential college and edited the college articles to use it.

if you find yourself adding the same data to a lot of similar articles in future, it's probably worth considering adding a field to the relevant infobox to start with, rather than using the 'free' field. TSP (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rankings graphs

Hi EmyRussell, I was wonder if {{Graph:Lines}} would be helpful for these graphs? It looks like the data needs to be stored on wikimedia commons data, but it might make it easier to add future years and have the graphs (semi)automatically update. It might be possible to link the rankings table templates to the wikimedia commons data as well (but I've not looked into how this works). Robminchin (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Robminchin:. I had considered this, but the y-axis was not entirely appropriate based on the graphs I had played with: see User:EmyRussell/sandbox. My concerns were regarding the bunched y-axis data for Oxbridge, the inconsistency of the highest value being 0 for some charts but 1 for others and my own personal preference for matching colours. If these concerns were addressed, I would be very open to exploring the usage of graphs instead. I liked the Wikimedia commons data as it is possible for the file to be easily replaced (and therefore updated yearly) and the ability to control for appropriate y-axis. EmyRussell (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ian H. White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sorting out…..

….the reference I added to the Simon Fanshawe article, after I had made a complete pig’s ear of it. Sweet6970 (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, it was just a small typo. Happy editing! :) EmyRussell (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gifford Lectures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Newcastle Wildcats

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Newcastle Wildcats, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

Note: I think you meant to AfD it which would make sense as there was previously no consensus, but it still can't be proposed deletion per the policy on that process. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]