User talk:Enterfacts

vn-0

This user talk page has been vandalized 0 times.

Welcome!

Hi Enterfacts! I noticed your contributions to House of Representatives of the Philippines and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:20, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article icon

Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to Mahathir Mohamad, an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/S2K-Lynx, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tartan,
I know you don't want me to edit myanmar and myanmar-connected pages, I just wanted to say that I changed a lot since you banned my account. I don't commit vandalism anymore. So, I'm sorry to say that, you can tell me what I am wrong and where I was wrong in editing Myanmar. I just put the type of government with notes, but you reverted it. What is wrong with you man. I love editing Wikipedia Pages with sources, but you are the obstacle of every step we make. I'm sorry to say that, your abusing user's rights. - Enterfacts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enterfacts (talk • contribs) 06:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enterfacts, stop making new accounts. Wikipedia has a strict one editor, one account policy. If you wish to continue editing, you must make a successful appeal on your original account, S2K-Lynx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I will discuss with you there if you wish. I will not engage further with any of your socks. Socks will be indefinitely blocked as soon as they are discovered. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 18:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Castle Clash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castle Clash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Clash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nearlyevil 665 03:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- ferret (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]