User talk:Epelerenon

Welcome!

Hi Epelerenon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Vsmith (talk) 13:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Spanish colonization of the Americas have been undone. The reason was that you removed sourced content without explanation. In the future please always explain your edits, either on the article talk page or with a clear edit summary. Vsmith (talk) 13:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Thanks for updating the list of religions by country. I noticed that "Christianity in Canada|Christianity" has been cut-and-pasted into all of the infoboxes; please correct (e.g. change "Christianity in Canada|Christianity" in the Colombia article to "Christianity in Colombia|Christianity]]. Thanks. Contributor321 (talk) 15:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Nauru. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm IamNotU. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dominican Republic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In this edit: [1], you gave figures of 1.3% "other Christian" and 0.9% "others", while the source gives only a 2.2% total for "other". It's not permitted to make your own estimates about statistics. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 16:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edit to Benin. There is no point in removing a credible red link. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting input and expansion support

Hi,

We are just in process of expanding encyclopedic article Draft:Ex-Muslims. Please do have a look at the article including discussions referred at Draft talk:Ex-Muslims.

Then there is one more related topic Superstitions in Muslim societies in need of expansion support.

If topic interests you then do contribute towards expansion of the Draft:Ex-Muslims and Superstitions in Muslim societies with references.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 15:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me. I will surely look into these articles and try to expand them. Regards Epelerenon (talk) 15:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Honduras, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In this edit: [2] you changed religious demographics numbers from "2% other" to "2% other Christian / 1% other", in contradiction to what the cited source says. This is the second time you've been warned about doing this. This also does not adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Please stop falsifying statistics in this way. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 15:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IamNotU sorry my bad. I was changing the list format only. I must have mistakenly changed the figures. Epelerenon (talk) 15:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sockpuppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Epelerenon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Balolay per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Balolay. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. qedk (t 愛 c) 10:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]