User talk:Etnier

Hello, Etnier! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given your username, you may have a conflict of interest in writing about Stephen M. Etnier. If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

I saw the draft from the link on your userpage and it looks reasonably neutral to me. Things to avoid are "greatest artist ever" unless you can quote a reliable source that calls him that (or anything else - see WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPOV.

It would also help if you used inline citations. This is fairly easy to do - basically you just add a ref tag and put the material in it like this: <ref>Smith, John. ''Big Book of Famous Artists'', Some Publisher, 1999, pp 45-56.</ref></ref>. Then you put this after the sentence(s) it needs to back up, and put {{reflist}} at the bottom in a References section, so

Sentence needing a ref.^[1]

References

^ Smith, John. Big Book of Famous Artists, Some Publisher, 1999, pp 45-56.

You can also get fancy and use {{cite book}} and {{cite journal}} for magazines. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would keep the extra references and use them if possible. On Wikipeida notability is established by multiple refs to different reliable sources, so sourcing eveything to one ref would be bad (make the subject appear less notable).

I prefer conversations on Wikipedia talk pages (not email) as they make things more transparent. Please don't forget to sign your posts with four ~ and it is generally a good idea to add new posts to the bottom of tal pages (not the top). Clicking on the new section tab does this automatically. You can also continue discussion in a section (like I am here).

Finally model articles are always good for ideas and examples to follow - our best work is Featured articles (FA) and El Greco is an FA on an artist that may be a good model. Henry Moore is a FA too. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I combined two refs using the ref name = "blah" trick. You can do the same for the others. I think the name of his third ship is wrong - there does not appear to have been a ship ever named "USS General Omar Bradley" - see List of United States Navy ships: G-H. There was a USS General Omar Bundy which is from the right era and ocean. COuld this be it instead? Tourmaline existed, but is a red link (no article yet). I would also go back and add the wikilink to the bio when it is moved to mainspace (instead of the external link to his official webpage). Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I first saw your edit to the article List of people from York, Pennsylvania, where you added him as "Stephen M. Etnier" (external link to the official website). Once the article is in main space, it should be linked as a wikilink, Stephen M. Etnier. I was looking to add wikilinks to the draft, which is how I found the ship error. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome - hopefully you'll like the place and write or add to more articles, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

§hep • ^Talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

DYK

Your welcome! Always willing to help out. I also wanted to let know that I nominated your article to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. --D.B.^{talk•contribs} 03:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

The images of the piantings are very nice - it might be useful to add their dates to the captions. It is possible someone may question the copyright status, if so you may need to go through the Wikipedia:OTRS system, but that is a bridge to cross only if needed. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stephen Etnier

On January 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stephen Etnier, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 22:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 05:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FEED

I left you some feedback on WP:FEED#John Etnier per your request. Sorry it is so late. I haven't been giving feedback as often lately (school and whatnot), and there aren't many editors that consistently watch that page. If you enjoyed getting the feedback, you should consider answering somebody else's request on that page! :) Killiondude (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mizpah

Could you give me one example of something you want added as an inline ref and I will do it and then you can see and ask questions if it is not clear? Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

At the end of "Final Years" there are two hyperlinks. They also appear as last two items in the reference section.

Perhaps I put them in OK, but it doesn't seem right to me. Seems like the hyperlinks at the end of "Final Years" should just be numbers pointing to the References section?

Etnier (talk) 01:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed your reply here and thanks for replying on my talk page - I will add the two links as inline citations within the next 8 hours or so. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much!! Etnier (talk) 03:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome Let me know if you have more questions. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 10:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Etnier

The article John Etnier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Individual of questionable notability, all references are unverifiable, possible autobiography

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. role^player 00:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Etnier for deletion

The article John Etnier is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Etnier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Off2riorob (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Smith, John. Big Book of Famous Artists, Some Publisher, 1999, pp 45-56.

[1]