User talk:EverCriticised

{{unblock|LOOK YOU TOTAL MORONS I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET I WAS TOLD THAT I WAS ABLE TO SET UP AN ACCOUNT SO I DID. (Through emails with User:Callanecc. I HAD EVEN SAID THAT I WAS LOUISPHILIPPECHARLES SO IF I WAS AN EFFING "SOCK PUPPET" SURELY I WOULD HAVE OMITTED THAT FACT?! I DID NOT. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. THIS IS UNFAIR AND UNFOUNDED.}}

@Callanecc:- can you confirm this? PhilKnight (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: Please see User talk:Callanecc/Archive 15#With your blessing? for a discussion. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 19:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.