Jump to content

User talk:EvolutionArtsLLC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Persistent Real Object, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. noq (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Persistent Real Object has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable. Google only finds 2 references to "Persistent real object" - and one of those is this article and the other is a blog post.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]