User talk:Fct1

Sheredes Primary School

A tag has been placed on Sheredes Primary School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Diez2 16:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sheredesprimarytree_logo6.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sheredesprimarytree_logo6.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sheredesprimarytree logo6.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sheredesprimarytree logo6.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Skyscanner. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:09, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out, Barek. I gave the answer in Barek's wiki talk page (Barek), topic Skyscanner travel comparison site. This was a misunderstanding. I am not related to any of the various travelsites I added nor was I aware that this would be seen as spam. the note above is mostly not applicable to what happenned in this instance but I appreciate many people may be trying to spam this way. I am sure many people also object to information about competitors of companies with pages on wikipedia to be removed. 17:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Hayman30. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Grenfell Tower fire seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 13:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]