User talk:Fearlessniki

Jay Sarraf[edit]

Do you have any connection to Jay Sarraf? I have moved the article back to Draft:Jay Sarraf as it has insufficient independent sources. Guy (Help!) 22:46, 24 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Not really, i believe it has sufficient sources for Indian researchers and academicians, though will add more independent references. User Talk:fearlessniki

Jay Sarraf[edit]

You need to wait for independent review of this article, as it looks very much like a promotional piece created by or at the request of the subject. As it stands none of the sources passes the test of intellectual independence, and the article does not establish that this person meets the notability guideline. Also if you have any personal connection to the subject, including if you are working on this at the request of someone connected with the subject, you are required to declare it, especially if this is paid in any way (per Wikipedia's Terms of Use). Guy (Help!) 10:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Jay Sarraf[edit]

Draft:Jay Sarraf, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jay Sarraf and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Jay Sarraf during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 10:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jay Sarraf (November 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a resume service, so the article needs a rewrite. Please indicate how this person meets WP:NACADEMIC using news articles that are not related to the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jay Sarraf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jay Sarraf, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fearlessniki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest Inquiry[edit]

Your only edits have to do with Jay Sarraf. Do you have a financial or other interest? Please read the conflict of interest policy and make any required declaration. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I work within the same organisation, it is an educational institution, a he happens to be a faculty member at the same institution. I am new to Wikipedia, kindly guide and help. Fearlessniki (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kadambini Media[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kadambini Media, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://kadambini.org/about-us/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. creffett (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Huon (talk) 09:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]