User talk:Fez120

February 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kosovo Liberation Army. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. slakr^\ talk / 03:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are restricted to one revert per article per 24 hours for the next 3 months on all articles within the topic area.

You have been sanctioned due to repeated edit warring.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. slakr^\ talk / 03:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fez120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only reverted vandalism from Zoupan. I have given reasons on talk page on why his edits were irrelevant. Why am I the only one getting punished? Lock this page from Serbian editos and all PoV warring will stop. You are giving Serbian editors exklusive rights to edit Albanian pages and eliminating any voice of protest frrom the Albanian side. Fez120 (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Edits that you disagree with are not "vandalism". You were edit warring and blocked as a result, until you address this fact an unblock cannot be considered. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fez120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge my errors and the braking of edit rules. I don't know what else to say. I'm not even sure if I want to get unblocked, its not my wish to be an editor on Wikipedia. I created an account only to oppose Serbian editors having exclusive rights on Kosovo pages and filling them with propaganda. So don't unblock me, but than give me an appropriate tool to fight Serbian edit gang (most probably state founded)or exclude them from editing Kosovo pages and let neutral editors be responsible for that. Fez120 (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Don't unblock me -- ok. Its not my wish to be an editor on Wikipedia -- ok. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.