User talk:Fielding99
Hi, Fielding99. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}}
(and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
— e. ripley\talk 00:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments on talk pages
[edit]Please place you comments on talk pages in chronological order, adding new comments to the end rather than interspersing them. The way you are doing it now makes it very hard to follow the debate. Also you must stop reverting the article as there are a large number of users who disagree with you on the talk page. Continue the debate, but don't edit the article until consensus supporting the inclusion of the material is achieved. --Leivick (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Mitt Romney Cranbrook Incident
[edit]There is a straw poll taking place here, your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 23:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of E.M.I. (Sex Pistols song) for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E.M.I. (Sex Pistols song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.M.I. (Sex Pistols song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheldybett (talk) 07:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Marjan Philhour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The subject of the article didn't pass WP:NPOL. The office that the candidate is seeking didn't confer automatic notability either. Most of the coverage are local politics and sustained coverage aren't shown on the article, the subject didn't pass the notability bar.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)