User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions about User:FloridaArmy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Hope (politician) has been accepted

Sam Hope (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SportingFlyer T·C 05:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Oscar Haywood) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Oscar Haywood.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for your new article on Oscar Haywood.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Equitable Motion Picture Company has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Equitable Motion Picture Company. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equitable Motion Picture Company (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at World Film Company. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please discuss on the talk page of this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Equitable Motion Picture Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Equitable Motion Picture Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Coles (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucy Coles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucy Coles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 16:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugh Hurd (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hugh Hurd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hugh Hurd, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Laurel M. Lee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Laurel M. Lee. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 01:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurel M. Lee has been accepted

Laurel M. Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—teb728 t c 03:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Bradfield Thoburn (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoolSkittle was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Joseph Bradfield Thoburn instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Bradfield Thoburn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Bradfield Thoburn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoolSkittle (talk) 06:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie Crump (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still fails WP:NACTOR. Work more on the content and references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freddie Crump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Freddie Crump, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mgbo120 (talk) 10:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

He wasn't an actor he was a drummer. And his performances were so spectacular he was featured in several movies. I am resubmitting. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Freddie Crump has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Freddie Crump. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Malachi Martin (warden) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malachi Martin (warden). Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equitable Motion Picture Company has been accepted

Equitable Motion Picture Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:William L. Sherrill has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William L. Sherrill. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Couper Gibbs has been accepted

George Couper Gibbs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William L. Sherrill has been accepted

William L. Sherrill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Couper Gibbs (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Add more content in a neutral tone to suit wiki guidelines. Look for more references as well

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Couper Gibbs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George Couper Gibbs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mgbo120 (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Florida Secretary of State is a notable position. I have no idea what you think isn't neutral about the content. I resubmitted the draft. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Me either. I've asked User:Mgbo120 to explain. I approved the page too. Legacypac (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Evans (author) (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 04:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Mersereau (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 05:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank K. Root (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Frohman brothers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Invisible Ray

Gladys Hanson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Climbers

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel James (boxer)

The article Daniel James (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer does not meet WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Mersereau has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Mersereau. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A.C. Bilicke (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A.C. Bilicke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A.C. Bilicke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank K. Root has been accepted

Frank K. Root, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray Malone (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

insufficient WP:RS to establish WP:N

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ray Malone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ray Malone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 04:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florence Dagmar has been accepted

Florence Dagmar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel James (boxer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel James (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel James (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRehse (talk) 10:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Evans (author) (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources used are not independent of the subject. This fails WP:BIO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Larry Evans (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Larry Evans (author), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mgbo120 (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Evans (author) has been accepted

Larry Evans (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yolande Pompey has been accepted

Yolande Pompey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 03:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Very nice. If you want to expand, I think you would be able to find some information through Google Books or Newspapers.com. I wasn't really sure about the categories for the page so I will let you add what is appropriate. Good job!--CNMall41 (talk) 03:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: When a Man Rides Alone (1919 film) has been accepted

When a Man Rides Alone (1919 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Omni Flames (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josiah Sherman has been accepted

Josiah Sherman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Ratcliff has been accepted

Walter Ratcliff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ollie Gilbert (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

fails WP:GN and WP:ENT

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ollie Gilbert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ollie Gilbert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oberlin Academy Prepatory School (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per the reason by The Drover's Wife. You didn't add nor change any references. The same reason applies this time as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oberlin Academy Prepatory School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oberlin Academy Prepatory School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

It's Boothsift 20:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oberlin Academy Prepatory School has been accepted

Oberlin Academy Prepatory School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Iredell Turner has been accepted

William Iredell Turner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ollie Gilbert has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ollie Gilbert. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 01:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oberlin Academy Prepatory School (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It sounds potentially notable, but the references are extremely barebones: a link to the university's archive about them, a school's history page, and a passing mention in a book doesn't really cut it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oberlin Academy Prepatory School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oberlin Academy Prepatory School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Based on the alumni and history notability seems to be very well established. I have resubmitted. I don't think Oberlin College is an unreliable source for the high school. I have resubmitted. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Two reviewers disagreed with you, and the upshot of continually resubmitting is that your article got deleted instead. Please use this as a learning moment and actually fix issues that are highlighted by reviewers. The requirement that sources be independent of the subject to count towards notability is very clear in the message posted above. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

If you are convinced it isn't notable please take it to a deletion discussion. I would caution you taht common sense as well as policy, apply in this case and others.FloridaArmy (talk) 02:32, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

A university archive coverage of a high school that closed over 100 years ago is independant of the subject. The extensive list of notable alumni shows the school is worth a page. Here might be a case to include the high school in the University topic but then WP:SPINOUT would also apply. Legacypac (talk) 02:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

It isn't when the university and the high school are related, and you couldn't WP:SPINOUT because it had neither the sources nor the content for it. Wouldn't it be easier to like, add some sources so the article actually complies with policy, instead of just resubmitting and resubmitting until you get a different answer? The upshot of that strategy, this time, was that your article was deleted by a third person after being declined twice by different reviewers. You're clearly capable of doing more thoroughly researched work, as with the article I accepted afterwards which was much better sourced: if you'd bothered to do that level of work here (even after the need for it was twice pointed out!), you'd still have an article and we wouldn't need to be having this discussion. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Oberlin Academy Preparatory School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oberlin Academy Preparatory School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oberlin Academy Preparatory School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ollie Gilbert has been accepted

Ollie Gilbert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Oberlin Academy Preparatory School) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Oberlin Academy Preparatory School.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Procedural reviewed now that it's at AfD

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barkeep49}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:10, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moi Avei has been accepted

Moi Avei, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hami Yawari has been accepted

Hami Yawari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi FloridaArmy! You created a thread called William Sherrill at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Union Station (Clinton Massachusetts) has been accepted

Union Station (Clinton Massachusetts), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldron Baily (February 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 10:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Captain Charles Gilson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Captain Charles Gilson. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Connell & Sons has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Connell & Sons. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Heart of the Blue Ridge (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Pls read WP:NBOOK notability requirements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Heart of the Blue Ridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Heart of the Blue Ridge, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Georgina Wade Wilson (February 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 04:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gertrude Ellen Hayes (February 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Coles (February 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Friendly Reminder

Hi. Just a friendly reminder that your reply to Phil Bridger at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oberlin Academy Preparatory School technically violates your restriction of one comment per AfD for articles created by you. This discussion could end up at keep or merge and I would hate to see you sanctioned for a conversation that might reach your preferred outcome even without further input from you. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, thanks. I have removed it. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Heart of the Blue Ridge has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Heart of the Blue Ridge. Thanks! Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Delbert Daniels has been accepted

Jesse Delbert Daniels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

^{[Username Needed]} 13:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gene Coy (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gene Coy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gene Coy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mallory Square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Curry

Oberlin Academy Preparatory School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shaw High School

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Fixed. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Green (silent film actress) has been accepted

Dorothy Green (silent film actress), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Bone (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Bone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Bone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Armstrong College (California) has been accepted

Armstrong College (California), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Naraht (talk) 20:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Gilson has been accepted

Charles Gilson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Creating pages in the mainspace

Hi. As far as I am aware, your restriction against creating pages directly in the mainspace still exists (it is still listed at the active restrictions). I have moved Walking on Air (1946 film) to draft space. I haven't moved Money, Money, Money (disambiguation), Dixon Building, Jared Elliott, William Cocke (disambiguation) or J. R. Smith (disambiguation), but technically your ban also extends to disambiguation pages (not to redirects). Fram (talk) 15:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, thanks Fram. It's not the firdt time it's happened. Thankfully I think I have usually (always?) been the one to catch the mistake. When it came time to submit the draft I would have realized I had created it in mainspace by accident and moved it (as I have done before). I am only human and do make mistakes. As far as disambig pages, I thought that the restriction applied to articles. I am not sure how to locate the restriction but wouldnbe happy to take another look. I have tried to avoid Afd all together, and have for the most part, and think I have abided by the intent of the restrictions. Perhaps it's time for an appeal. It certainly complicates matters for me and adds lots of work for Afc reviewers. Seems pretty ridiculous really. If Wikipedia wants subjects worked up somewhat before theu are moved to mainspace I can do that although I think it goes against the history and intents Wikipedia was founded on and its pillars. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Editing restrictions and look for your own username. I have no opinion on the validity of the restriction, and whether it has served its purpose and can be lifted or not. I have not looked into it, I just saw your name while new page patrolling and thought I had seen it with a restriction. Looking at your recent creations, this article certainly looked like an error on your part, not a deliberate violation; and the disambigs is something which I thought you might not consider to fall within your ban, but the text is "FloridaArmy is prohibited from creating new articles in mainspace", and disambiguations are articles. Fram (talk) 09:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Just browsed by. About the Dixon Building, that's like many disambiguation pages I have created, and I would support it existing. Fram is right no this I think and a disambiguation page is an article. When I was restricted from creating articles in mainspace for a while I submitted new disambiguation pages to AFC, if i created any, if I recall correctly (it was quite a while ago). Yes i could create redirects, and in some sense a disambiguation page is a glorified combo of redirects, but still. Anyhow to try to get back into compliance with your restriction about that, how about you please move it yourself to userspace or draftspace. Then ping me and I will address it, and same about any other disambiguation pages. Let me know. --Doncram (talk) 04:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Bone has been accepted

David Bone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 08:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Nice to bump into you. We used to run into each other from time to time, but I hadn't see you around in a while and, well, the truth its that this place can be so unpleasant that editors seem to just get fed up and leave. Glad to see that you're still active. Cheers! E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Life can definitely be challenging here. Thanks for your great work as always! Take care and happy endeavors. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gonzelle White (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not insert ridiculous stuff like this (advertisements, seriously?) and this (which drops the name in the most trivial of all fashion) as sources. You have been here for long enough to not do stuff akin to ref-bombing.

This and this's hardly a source, either.

Sampson's book collects a lot many of reviews of that era (and that doesn't contribute to standalone notability).

Lynn and Doug's book namedrops her to be a popular singer (and that book mentions several performers in a similar manner. There is not any significant coverage. Over Kancas City Zazz; Basie mentions her in a single line as to be amazed by her feats.

Not sure about Record Research but that's hardly SIGCOV either from snippet-view..

Please add sources that devote significant and non-trivial coverage to her. Till now, none does.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gonzelle White and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gonzelle White, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

∯WBG^converse 07:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

A bylined Times-Union article noting that "In its first year, Proctor's hosted the minstrel show Gonzell White's Revue — around the time that Count Basie was playing with them as a pianist. " isn't a legitimate source? Baloney. And the ad featuring Gonzell is an ad featuring Gonzell. Are you disputing she is pictured and noted as a representative for the company? My suggestion to you is of you are so confident she isn't notable take it to a deletion discussion. I have very little doubt what the outcome will be. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A. R. Meek has been accepted

A. R. Meek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SportingFlyer T·C 07:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lenny Mendonca (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at California High Speed Rail Authority. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too soon, need more sources that detail Mendonca that aren't press releases

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lenny Mendonca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lenny Mendonca, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alvan S. Harper has been accepted

Alvan S. Harper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldron Baily has been accepted

Waldron Baily, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leonard Robert Brightwell has been accepted

Leonard Robert Brightwell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Heart of the Blue Ridge has been accepted

The Heart of the Blue Ridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Connell & Sons has been accepted

James Connell & Sons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. Brainard Sons (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Both the two additional references only establish that the company published a periodical, not that it was a notable periodical or that publishing the periodical is a notable achievement. In fact one of those references is just a copy of the periodical which technically is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S. Brainard Sons and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S. Brainard Sons, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 14:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 14:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Dan arndt Not true. The Jstor article goes into detail. And the subject was already cited to an entire entry in an existing encyclopedia (Encyclopedia of Cleveland History) and other sources noting and discusing the subject. It would easily survive a deletion discussion and your obstructing its creation and that of other notable subjects goes against policy and is disruptive. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palabala has been accepted

Palabala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Catch (1961 film) (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Include more critical reception, major reviews etc

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Catch (1961 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Catch (1961 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Virginia Warwick has been accepted

Virginia Warwick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eagleash (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit comments

I've been going through Oberlin Academy Preparatory School trying to clean things up. I notice that none of your edits have edit summaries. I know this has been mentioned to you before, but it appears you're still not using them. Please use them. It only takes a moment, and it's really helpful to other editors who come after you who are searching for something in the history. Continuing to not use them is an ongoing disservice to your fellow editors. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

I often use edit summaries if I make a major change or one that I think may be controversial. I often don't use edit simmaries when I am making minor edits, for a variety of reasons. I also have been working a lot in draft space. Building articles. So I don't think it's as important to establish the purpose for each edit since they are all related to article building. The point of including the sporting event in the Oberlin Academy article was to establish that the school had competitive sports programs and some of the teams they competed against at the time (1910). I think it's standard to include what leagues and divisions a school competes in. I don't know if those existed in 1910. I believe this is of historical interest. I also think it's worth including some of the alumni in the body and not just in the alumni section. Having had the founder of what became the ANC as a student, for example, is pretty interesting / important. And you removed key details of that history entirely.

I disagree with your criticisms of the afc process in regards to the article (and per the discussion they seem to have been based on misrepresentations and misunderstandings) and found them damaging and unhelpful towards getting notable historical and other articles created according to our well established policies. I hope in future you will focus on reforming those who are damaging the encyclopedia and undermining its five pillars instead of victims of their attacks. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Looking at the edit history I find several of my edits.with edit summaries consistent with my statement and reasoning above. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin L. Hollywood has been accepted

Edwin L. Hollywood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Folu Storms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aguda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray Malone (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still requires more references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ray Malone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ray Malone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 09:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Alvan S. Harper) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Alvan S. Harper.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Alvan S. Harper.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Betty Holzendorf has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Betty Holzendorf. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2019 (UTC)