User talk:Fortunato luigi

Orphaned non-free image File:Radar08PromoCD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radar08PromoCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Britney Spears promo tours

I was just wondering why would you nominate it for deletion? It was just temporary until List of Britney Spears concert tours became FL (it met the criteria with the layout i did). After that, i was planning to do the same with the promo tours page. Xwomanizerx (talk) 04:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The concert tour article is not weak. However, i made up all the promo tours sections months ago when i didn't know about GA, FA and FL. Those columns have no sources whatsoever and are fancrufty. Its article should be deleted and the information not added to the concert tour article. I suggest you take a look at the standards we have to meet at List of concert tours by Michael Jackson and The Jackson 5. Xwomanizerx (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're saying. What you're trying to do is the same thing i did with ...Baby One More Time Tour and Crazy 2K Tour. Crazy 2K was a stub because it was basically an extension on the first leg in terms of choreography, stage and setlist. So that's why i merged it. The thing is that Crazy 2K received third party notability, where as the only promo tour to have this from Britney is the mall tour. In any case, there should be a separate section between the lead section and the concert tours section where the mall tour should be listed without a setlist, since there are no sources for it. Do you agree? Xwomanizerx (talk) 05:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there must be some source for the mall tour because i read it somewhere. Still, the other promo tours were made up by me a few months ago, copied from a similar article in List of Madonna concert tours. The setlist, as you'll see, consists of every performance she ever did on TV shows. That doesn't mean she performed it at every show. So it is still b.s. lol. The promo tours are a complete fabrication and should be taken out from an article that may met FL criteria. The performances and promotion for each album is already listed on the albums Promotion section. Xwomanizerx (talk) 06:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro (song)

May I enquire as to what this edit is all about? Regards, SunCreator (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Singles Collection singles edits

Please, since i'm the one who nominated and helped promote most of the articles you edited to GA, i wish you could just ask me if you're going to do an edit like this. The format is actually a boxset, and not a "box" as you edited. I know you're not a vandal, so i just wanted to make that clear. Xwomanizerx (talk) 04:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promo singles

No, they don't have to be mentioned. See examples of promo singles that are GA such as Beautiful, Dirty, Rich. Xwomanizerx (talk) 03:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Britney's Other EPs

Ok, so I have been looking into this for a week now and I see no site rule saying what EP's can and not be included in a template. However, other users have stated that a template is made for easy navigation around a certain subject. So shouldn't we add Britney's others EP's to the template? --Shadow (talk) 02:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Britney Spears videography

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Britney Spears videography. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britney Spears videography. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Me against music.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Me against music.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And Then We Kiss

Well, my main reason for deleting the section was that there's actually no information about the song that can't be included in the rest of the article. If you read B in the Mix, you'll see that every section has some information about ATWK as an album song. It has no special coverage whatsoever; when I added all the information in the rest of the article, the only thing left was the infobox and the tracklisting. And as stated in WP:NSONGS, every song with only a tracklisting shouldn't have a page (I don't think even a section). About the Madonna article, I think it was a quick way (as I did previously) of merging the articles, but I don't think it's correct. I followed the example of The Cherrytree Sessions (Lady Gaga EP), which was deleted and is mentioned in her discography. Not every song, every album has to have a separate article if it has not received major coverage. And frankly, Britney didn't give ATWK much attention (not a music video, not a live performance)... Why should we? Xwomanizerx (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GabrielleSolis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GabrielleSolis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stages-dvd-cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stages-dvd-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Britney Spears filmography for deletion

The article Britney Spears filmography is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britney Spears filmography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Xwomanizerx (talk) 05:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JulieMayer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JulieMayer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Till the World Ends"

Hey Fortunato luigi, I'm starting the article for "Till the World Ends". However, the song isn't notable enough to have an article (right now), so I'm collecting all the info that I can to edit the article later when the song enter on any chart... If you can help, I would be very grateful! Thanks! :) - Sauloviegas (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JulieMayer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JulieMayer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Till the World Ends track listings.

Hello, I see you are a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Britney Spears and I am inviting you to join a discussion at Talk:Till the World Ends#Tracklistings. about the track listing format on the Britney articles. I would appreciate some opinions. Thanks Nicholas (talk) 00:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Me against music.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Me against music.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GabrielleSolis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GabrielleSolis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviving WikiProject:Britney Spears

Hi there! I am looking to revive WikiProject Britney Spears, and saw that you are listed as a participant. Existing members are just as important as new ones, and I invite you to take a look at the revised to-do list and help us promote more articles to GA and FA status! Regards, WikiRedactor (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:B&KCP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:B&KCP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Me against music.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Me against music.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]