User talk:Freddieandthedreamers

Your article on History of the Jews in Croatia looks like original research, something Wikipedia does not tolerate—hence the {{delete}} tag on top of it. Please provide sources for your information, otherwise it will get deleted. Thank you. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 19:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good start to your article History of the Jews in Croatia. Please contribute further to the article. --JJay 03:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Freddie B. Lewis

Please read WP:BIO to make sure that any biographies you write meet our notability criteria. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 19:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with History of the Jews in New Zealand

Hello. Concerning your contribution, History of the Jews in New Zealand, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/New_Zealand.html. As a copyright violation, History of the Jews in New Zealand appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. History of the Jews in New Zealand has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:History of the Jews in New Zealand. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at History of the Jews in New Zealand, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Carabinieri 18:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beware of copyright issues

Hi, I tried to rewrite History of the Jews in Slovakia to prevent copyright issues. Please don't recopy outside material to Wikipedia. You are encouraged to use them to write your own version, with your own words. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add copyrighted content

You have twice added copyrighted content to History of the Jews in Iceland which I've now deleted. Above I see you've been warned about this before. Please stop or you are likely to be blocked. Haukur 22:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Jews in Iceland

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article History of the Jews in Iceland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clicketyclack 08:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You again added material copied from another website to the article. I am placing an indefinite block on your account. If you convince me that you have a rudimentary understanding of copyright and will not violate it in the future I will lift the block. Haukur 17:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user has sent me e-mails requesting to be unblocked. I do not feel justified in doing so. On the other hand I've told him that he can appeal my block by using the 'unblock' template. If he does that I ask the reviewing admin(s) to look at the situation without prejudice, I will not feel slighted in the least if the decision is made to unblock the user. Haukur 16:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked the user after promises by e-mail that he will not plagiarze articles. Haukur 17:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]