User talk:FreshBulletTime

Hello

Maybe you do own too much stuff, but please don't vandalize Wikipedia. Thanks. freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 02:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to Talk:2006 North Korean nuclear test will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rklawton 22:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding links to copyrighted videos

Please stop adding link to videos that have an established copyright. I can understand about the South Park episodes but including the whole Battle Royale video is completely illegal. Gdo01 22:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:142.227.13.1

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for one week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Owen× ☎ 00:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I only posted something on the talk page which is not vandalism. I didn't put something on the main page which would be vandalism. I would really like to contribute to some other articles so please can you deblock me.}}

I'm grateful for the contributions you've made -- really! -- but you've also vandalized a number of pages over time, and you need to know that vandalism and personal attacks really aren't acceptable -- we take such things seriously. While you generally do have more leeway on talk pages, that leeway isn't absolute; see talk page guidelines, among other key policies. With that in mind, I feel you should have been blocked. Per the assumption of good faith, and hoping that you've learned your lesson, I've reduced the duration of the block so that it will last another 24 hours. Please do continue to contribute. Regards, Luna Santin 06:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of the 100 largest municipalities in Canada by population

Note that this edit contradicts the cited source. Don't change population numbers to some ephemeral value with no citation. Thanks. Mind matrix 18:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --Gary Will 23:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page lists the populations as they were in 2001, not "what they would have been in 2001 if municipal boundaries were other than they were and as they were later changed to be." In 2001, the City of Montreal's population is what is listed. The City has changed since then and is now geographically bigger. We all get that. It doesn't change what the population was in 2001. --Walor 04:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hitomi promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hitomi promo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

August Underground Mordum

The article August Underground Mordum has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. See also WP:ATTRIBUTION. NawlinWiki 03:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to North Korea will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Icactus 12:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 16:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So now saying the truth is vandalism you fascist fuck? Don't even try to say that North Korea isn't a Totalitarian Dictatorship because you won't find ANY argument. It is, accept it.

French people

I have removed the image Image:René lévesque.jpg from the article, because a non-free is unnecessary there; it previously contained a free one in its place. (It would probably be usable in an article about René Lévesque, but that image already has its share of fair use images.) In addition, the file has no copyright tag, and no information on its source. Please have a look at fair use and image use policies and guidelines for more details. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft 14:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility and personal attacks

Please be civil and stop making personal attacks. Continuing to do so will get you blocked. --Wafulz 15:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo pq.jpg

Hello, FreshBulletTime. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Logo pq.jpg) was found at the following location: User:FreshBulletTime. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Utada Hikaru Promo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Utada Hikaru Promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Elisha cuthbert Wire Image.JPG

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Elisha cuthbert Wire Image.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Elisha cuthbert Wire Image.JPG has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Elisha cuthbert Wire Image.JPG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:KarineVanasse1.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:KarineVanasse1.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:KarineVanasse1.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[3][4]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:KarineVanasse1.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin D Roosevelt

I reverted your edit to the photo caption on the Franklin Roosevelt page. The photo in question shows FDR signing the war declaration against Germany. When he signed the Japanese war declaration, FDR was wearing a black double breasted suit.THD3 19:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree images on userpage

I've removed another nonfree image from your userpage. Only free content (licensed as GFDL, public domain, or CC-BY-SA) may be used outside of articles, including in userspace. As this will be your second warning for this, any further use of nonfree media in your userspace is likely to lead to a block from editing or protection of your userpage. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lanny Barbie

I wish to point out to you that all of the other porn stars on Wikipedia are referred to by their country of origin, and not by their state, province, or whatever other subunit. For example:

Jenna Jameson: "...an American pornographic actress and..."
Katja Kassin: "...a German pornographic actress."
Ginger Lynn: "an American pornographic actress..."

Even other people from Quebec are similarly discussed:

Celine Dion: "...is a Canadian pop singer"
Corey Hart: "...is a Canadian musician."
Caroline Rhea: "is a Canadian stand-up comedian..."

Thus Lanny Barbie should be similarly referred to. Tabercil 23:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter if Quebec has been recognized as a nation by the House of Commons. The fact is that it is still a province of Canada, and as I pointed out, the pattern here it to identify a person by what country they are from, not what state/province/canton. Tabercil 21:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pimp userbox deletion

Someone proposed the pimp userbox (that I made) that's on your userpage for deletion at [[5]], even though it's a userbox (and therefore doesn't have to be encyclopedic) and does not meet any userbox content restrictions as per Wikipedia:Userboxes#Content_restrictions. Please help me prevent it from being deleted. SteveSims 00:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This is a polite request that you stop advocating hatred on your userpage. You are free to state that you oppose the governments of certain nations, or the adherents of certain fads, but don't hate. DS 17:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Gackt3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gackt3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Pierre_falardeau.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Pierre_falardeau.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chakushin_ari_cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chakushin_ari_cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chiaki_kuriyama.jpg

I have tagged Image:Chiaki_kuriyama.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:René_lévesque.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:René_lévesque.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Montreal

I see you are a user located in Montréal, you may be interested in: Wikipedia:Meetup/Montreal. Please add your name to the "Interested" or to the "Not interested" list. Date is set for May 3rd 2008 and Buffet La Stanza is the proposed location. If you have another idea for the location; propose away! Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 04:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man

I think monarchy sucks too! random huh? Captain Spleen (talk) 21:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States article

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kman543210 (talk) 03:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to North Korea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

Hello, FreshBulletTime,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chakushin ari cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chakushin ari cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]