User talk:Futuremoviewriter

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss was changed by Futuremoviewriter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953196 on 2011-08-20T00:19:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Empire Strikes Back ending

The article Empire Strikes Back ending has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced Neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cliffhanger endings to sequels are often compared to the ending of Empire Strikes Back. That's where the term came from.

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Citizen Kane, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to X-Men Origins: Wolverine does not have an edit summary. I have reverted your edit, as you ignored a note that had been left in the article and did not discuss your change on the Talk page or leave an edit summary explaining your change. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to How to Rock. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fictional antiheroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star Wars Saga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to How to Rock. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of How to Rock episodes

The episodes listed conform to the numbering as shown at iTunes and Amazon.com. Also see comments on talk page. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of How to Rock episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Future episode info with fake reference. Reference used said nothing about what was added. Not cool. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nickandmore.com as a reference

I am glad to see you found some references that supported the info you added. About Nickandmore.com though, see discussions at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#Clicker.com and Nick and More! and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 101#nickandmore.com about nickandmore as a reference. Conclusion is that it doesn't meet WP:RS standards. I'm going to ignore it for now as the info referenced that you added using nickandmore.com is plausible and will soon be obsoleted by the actual episode guide info (TV Guide, Futon critic) and the airing of the actual episodes and leaving it there heads off a lot of editing hassle. Just FYI for future reference. Other editors may be less tolerant – it would be great if you could find a better reference. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(David's twitter comments about producing 26 episodes is that is what he was contracted to produce when he was given the production order. Two of his produced episodes were merged into one for presentation and that it a bummer that it didn't count as one for production purposes so that he could produce one more. My interpretation of what he said, anyway.) Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:17, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fictional antiheroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Antiheroes

Please read Wikipedia guidelnes on reliable sources. Someone on Twitter telling you that they are the writer for the show does not qualify as a reliable source. Edward321 (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And if it's confirmed that they are (he is)?

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Alice Englert

Hello, Futuremoviewriter. You have new messages at TheJJJunk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Futuremoviewriter. You have new messages at TheJJJunk's talk page. -- JJJ (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at TheJJJunk's talk page.
Hello. You have a new message at TheJJJunk's talk page.

Ways to improve Alice Englert

Hi, I'm Mabalu. Futuremoviewriter, thanks for creating Alice Englert!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I look forward to seeing this article expanded.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Victory Van Tuyl article

In Talk:Victory Van Tuyl you asked:

I gave references, this is a real person. She may not be well-known, but the information I displayed was accurate and I do not understand why the page is being deleted just because she's not the most popular person in the world.--Futuremoviewriter (talk) 12:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(I copied your question here as that talk page may get deleted.)

This is a real person but you didn't say in the article why she has notability as an actor. See WP:NACTOR for what is needed. Also must meet guidelines at WP:GNG. Suggest reading Wikipedia:Your first article for more info. Also the references you did add were from an unverified twitter account, only verified twitter accounts may be used as references. Too many posers to trust unverified accounts. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Twitter account is verified now as being her. So can the deletion now be undone?--Futuremoviewriter (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR

Feel free to find a source that describes Gabrielle Montez as a deuteragonist. Until then, don't add it back.—Kww(talk) 02:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was obvious. Troy is the protagonist of the trilogy, so in turn, Gabriella is the deuteragonist (secondary protagonist). Why would something like that need to be sourced?--Futuremoviewriter (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because it your opinion that Gabriella is the secondary antagonist, as opposed to any of the other characters in the story. I'm not saying you are wrong, but I am saying that that isn't a conclusion for a Wikipedia editor to come to.—Kww(talk) 22:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I said Gabriella is the secondary PROTAGONIST, as in deuteragonist because the trilogy primary revolves around her and Troy and I'm sure nobody else would dispute that fact. Sharpay would be the primary ANTAGONIST of the trilogy as she directly opposes Troy and Gabriella in their relationship. Ryan would be the secondary antagonist of the first movie, Fulton of the second and Tiara in the third as opposition not just to Sharpay, but when at first helping Sharpay to try to break Troy and Gabriella up. Reading the plot summaries of each movie will make most of this so abundantly clear that they would simply be considered statements that did not need to be sourced. I don't mean to be stingy, but I'm sure others would back me up on my claims too. --Futuremoviewriter (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So find a reliable source that backs you up. If your analysis is both correct and meaningful, you should be able to find a reliable source that agrees with you and cite it.—Kww(talk) 00:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody else verify it? I did a google search of gabriella montez deuteragonist and got nothing. Is there someone who trust who can tell you its true? Plus, the High School Musical Wiki and Villains Wiki each call Sharpay the main antagonist of the trilogy, so what now?--Futuremoviewriter (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Nasnema. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Q (James Bond), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Nasnema Chat 01:02, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Arnold!: The Movie

Hi, I recently reverted a few edits you made at Hey Arnold!: The Movie, because the information was unsourced and read as original research. Another editor removed this information on July 5, 2013, with a clear explanation here. Reverting their edit without explaining your changes, and without resolving the complaint that the information is unsourced, is not considered a constructive way to edit. If you wish to discuss your additions and argue for its inclusion, please do so on the article's talk page Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Last Airbender, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 07:54, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Castle

I'm sorry but the 3XK is not one of the main story lines in the show nor has it outlasted Becket's mother's story. 3XK did not even show up in the show until season 3 and was only in 2 episodes and mentioned in another 2 episodes, while The story of Beckett's Mother's murder has been a major story since season 1 and was in fact still going until the season finale this year. If you want to add this then go to the talk page to discuss and gain a consensus per WP:BRD. 2601:7:1940:4C:D1B5:D605:D383:5F68 (talk) 20:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, multiple consecutive edits

Hello, Futuremoviewriter. A couple suggestions for you to consider that will make it easier for us all to work together:

Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions.Eric ^talk 04:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elena Kampouris

The article Elena Kampouris has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Futuremoviewriter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Middle (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 20:17, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Futuremoviewriter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Futuremoviewriter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Dawson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]