User talk:Gareth Beyers

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gareth Beyers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Like I said I understand that it is wrong and would like to be allowed to edit the article. I have already declared my position

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gareth Beyers (talk) 10:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This block is per the general sanctions regarding crypto edits that you were notified of per the history of this page. You may be unblocked early if you agree to use the draft submission process due to your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked indefinitely due to your use of another account to evade your block. You will need to start communicating with us to resolve this. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now socked/meat with User:MamboAfrica. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gareth Beyers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand it was wrong to delete admin remarks on drafted articles. I was frustrated that every time I make edits it get rejected. I understand that its wrong to make alternative accounts to be able to edit. I would like to work with admins to contribute valuable input to wikipedia. Please unblock me so I can try again to contribute something valuable

Decline reason:

No. You were just caught evading your block again. You are closer to a community ban than you are to being unblocked. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that time, you'll need to address your inappropriate edits, your conflict of interest, and your sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 10:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gareth Beyers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla (talk) Like I said I understand that it is wrong and would like to be allowed to edit the article. I have already declared my position.

Decline reason:

You need to prove that you can follow our rules. You've already expressed your contempt for them by ignoring our attempts to enforce them. One way you can do that is the standard offer. That requires you to go six months without logged-out block evasion or creating sock puppets. You should edit another Wikimedia project, too, to show us that you can follow their rules. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One open unblock request at a time, please. You abusively have two. I'll reiterate that I think you have no chance of being unblocked without following WP:SO, given your repeated violations of WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 10:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Yamla (talk) I would like it to be reviewed as I have addressed the concerns stated. It seems like you have jumped to some assumptions without checking the facts that you are stating as evidence.[reply]

6 months

This user Will be open your request on 20-04-2023. For Yamla Mesisese (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? Gareth Beyers (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Africarare

Hello, Gareth Beyers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Africarare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]