User talk:Gastr850oath

This is Gastr850oath's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Prateek Sharma (Gastroenterologist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prateek Sharma (Gastroenterologist). Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 11:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DGG, thank you. I have responded and modified the draft as instructed. I've also provided the h-index (which is over 60) and five most cited publications - one of which has been cited over 200 times. Is there anything else to be done to demonstrate notability? Gastr850oath (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prateek Sharma (Gastroenterologist) (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Maybe a WP:TOOSOON case. The draft doesn't mention,... when he was born, when he graduated, etc. To be coherent, all pertinent facts must be arranged in a consistent and cohesive fashion as an integrated whole. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prateek Sharma (Gastroenterologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Prateek Sharma (Gastroenterologist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gastr850oath! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the draft again. Judging by the citations, and the quality of the journals in which the articles have been published, I think he does meet WP:PROF. The article does need rewriting, and the basic biographical facts specifying date of each degree, residency, and position, do have to be given and referenced. When you do that, let me know on my user talk page. DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DGG Done. Put graduation dates with references for both of his universities. Indicated residency and fellowship dates with references. Also indicated year he was awarded with the award. Gastr850oath (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prateek Sharma (Gastroenterologist) has been accepted

Prateek Sharma (Gastroenterologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]