User talk:Gebelein Man

See Gebelein predynastic mummies to know more about me. Do not post anything on my talk page; you are not welcome!

Gebelein Man, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Gebelein Man! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HostBot, are you a Pharaoh????????????

December 2012

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Polytechnic Institute of New York University, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 05:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at List of NYU Polytechnic Institute people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 05:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Polytechnic Institute of New York University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 05:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of NYU Polytechnic Institute people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 05:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marco, in all fairness, you should give me a warning too. I'm done with this editor; let him revert me all night long. I've reported them at AIV, and am awaiting an admin on the SPI to check the quacking, which is loud enough. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the messages that you tried to post on my talk page.

I do not understand the following messages, which you tried to post on my talk page. Tripodics (talk) 05:43, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NYU-Poly article and List of NYU Polytechnic Institute people

User Marco Guzman, Jr is vandalising both articles.--MUMMYMAN (talk) 04:44, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Best Regards,--MUMMYMAN (talk) 04:44, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

I ADDED A LOT OF NEW UPDATED INFORMATIONS--MUMMYMAN (talk) 05:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Mangoeater1000 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 05:44, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Badmachine

So I checked and Badmachine (talk · contribs) has no idea as to who you are. Now what? :D - Alison ^❤ 06:14, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

h

Hello, Badmachine here. Have we met? 174.141.208.104 (talk) 06:51, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Badmachine. I met you in Florida, Palm Bay in a Metropcs Wireless store. I don't want to mention my name in Wiki! Hope you are doing well. Make a new account like me.--MUMMYMAN (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Badmachine! I'm sure this guy just looked at my user page. Hope you're doing well--brohoof! Drmies (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]