User talk:Geetexcelsior

August 2013

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Online shopping. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Versa geek 04:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to E-commerce. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 08:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Horlicks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

"Horlicks Kesar Badaam" is the fourth variant in the Horlicks.<ref>[http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-01-17/news/46301399_1_portfolio-new-variant-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Elassint. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Dabur Research Foundation because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Elassint ^Hi 06:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Oriflame. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article Herbalism. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. Your edit was also made without an edit summary. From this talk page it seems you have already been warned about adding promotional external links. MrBill3 (talk) 08:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Ronz (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you are not allowed to use multiple accounts as you have...User:Geetanjaliexcelsior appears to be the same as you. I have indefinitely blocked that one. Only use this one here (once the block expires) if you wish to contribute to our encyclopedia. DMacks (talk) 18:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]