User talk:GjonPreni

GjonPreni, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi GjonPreni! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After discussion with this user

@Callanecc: I've just been talking to GjonPreni in the IRC unblock channel. We got disconnected partway through, but based on my quick look at this situation I think things might have gotten tangled up. Would you mind taking a look back through? Here's my rundown of what happened (I think), pulling from the logs and including pings to the involved users:

01:59, June 14, 2014 Bbb23 blocked Seventhegeneral with an expiry time of indefinite (Disruptive editing: including personal attacks, self-promotion, implicit threats)
03:53, June 14, 2014 User account Geechiedan was created
09:53, June 14, 2014 Favonian blocked Geechiedan with an expiry time of indefinite (Abusing multiple accounts: User:Seventhegeneral)
17:09, 15 June 2014, user files an unblock request on Seventhegeneral's talk page
Discussion ensues with Ohnoitsjamie
14:21, June 16, 2014 Ohnoitsjamie unblocks Seventhegeneral, advising the user to go through AfC if he wants to try to create his pet article
16:16, June 16, 2014 Account Seventhegeneral makes its last edit
16:48, June 16, 2014 User account GjonPreni was created
17:14, June 16, 2014 First edit by GjonPreni is to create a userpage beginning "I was under a previous account called 'Seventhegeneral'"
GjonPreni carries on editing. He tries to re-submit the article to mainspace, but then blanks it and returns to the AfC draft instead
19:08, 26 June 2014 STATicVapor opens an SPI (correctly) linking Seventhegeneral, Geechiedan, and GjonPreni.
04:18, June 29, 2014 Callanecc blocked GjonPreni and Seventhegeneral with an expiry time of indefinite (Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Seventhegeneral)

So in short, after Seventhegeneral was unblocked, the user switched accounts and began using GjonPreni and (mostly) taking the advice he was given at the time of his unblock. I haven't looked deeply into the content of his edits, so I don't know if they were blockable in and of themselves, but I think blocking the user based on sockpuppetry might have been an error.

Thanks for taking another look, all! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a mess. Maybe we should inquire into the role played by SevSaddam. Their only contribution was to the article draft, and the user name is suggestive – in more ways than one. Favonian (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am Gjon Preni, I am fan of Detroit Hip Hop with an affinity for D12, I originally thought that I was being Trolled by someone who had no authority to take down my edits. So I attempted to go around them not understanding how the platform works. After I was blocked I then understood the severity of my actions, I requested to be unblocked and vowed to NEVER violate the platform again. I again apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused from my ignorance. Lastly , I have 2 brothers who love and enjoy the same music in my apartment area, so I would assume sevsaddam could be one of them. I have already informed them that a violation would get us all blocked but as far as on my behalf I have only tried to edit correctly since being able to. If sevsaddam has violated any policy i will definitely have a chat with him to reiterate the policies and consequences of violation. Respect GjonPreni (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I have a couple questions for GjonPreni:

Why did you blank your userpage shortly after using it to declare your previous account (which you are required to do).
I find the WP:BROTHER excuse to be unconvincing, if it's your account (which it very much looks like it is) it is much much better just to admit it's yours. So is it yours?

Thanks for the talk page message Fluffernutter, I didn't get the ping for whatever reason. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you that I have taken full responsibility for the actions I caused on Wikipedia however the account spoken of with the "my little brother" excuse is not my account my brother in fact is 29 years old I have not broken any rules since being unblocked why am I being doubly penalized did the other account violate a policy? I removed the writing thinking I had put it in the wrong place and no one would see it so I removed it and informed an editor on the irc who in fact said ok as they were going to delete or disable the previous accounts. GjonPreni (talk) 23:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The policy it's breaking is WP:SOCK. However I'm willing to assume good faith that it's not your account and unblock this account, on the condition that you note on your userpage that the other accounts are yours (see the suggested template below):

You may also wish to use {{User shared IP address|SevSaddam}} to make that connection clear. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i agree and will do thank you GjonPreni (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This template is being used upon request of administrator so that the connection between all prior accounts are made here.

This user has alternative accounts named

Seventhegeneral, Geechiedan.

This user may sometimes share an IP address with SevSaddam.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Seven the General (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David Condrey (talk) 08:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder City Detroit 100 years of Crime & Violence has been accepted

Murder City Detroit 100 years of Crime & Violence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 08:21, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seven the General (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seven the General and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Mdann52talk to me! 07:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]