User talk:God Save the South/Archive 1

Are you in favor of slavery? If not, then why do you fly the Confederate flag?--Knowlege: Life's greatest gift, or terrible curse, how do you use it...? (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slavery was only one part of the CSA. You do not need to be pro-slavery to fly the Confederate flag, nor does flying it make you pro-slavery. --God Save the South (talk) 21:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That didn't answer either question.LeadSongDog (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ku Klux Klan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 08:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think your constant restoring of fundamentally incorrect information is worse than my repeated deletion of it. --God Save the South (talk) 08:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you dispute the content, discuss the dispute at talk, reach a consensus, then implement that consensus. That's how wikipedia works. The best time to do this is as soon as the disputing parties can determine that the dispute exists, before a string of reversions gives rise to animosity. This is particularly important when editing articles that are controversial to begin with.LeadSongDog (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008 (Again)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ku Klux Klan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Baegis (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

48 hour block for edit-warring continuously

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Ku Klux Klan. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Rudget (review) 15:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Request: Request limited unblock so I can contribute to the discussion on the talkpage. No article editing though for the remainder of the original block. Thankyou

Response: You've been unblocked, but consider yourself banned from editing that article for the rest of the block, as you said yourself. Since it's your first block, I'll assume good faith in letting you go.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]